AIToday
Amazon AI BlogPublished: Jul 1, 2026, 04:00 JST

IBS Software cuts cargo AI inference costs by 14× with Amazon Bedrock distillation

IBS Software cuts cargo AI inference costs by 14× with Amazon Bedrock distillation

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    IBS Software built a bilingual named-entity recognition system for cargo logistics email processing in English and Japanese, using Amazon Bedrock's model distillation to compress Amazon Nova Pro into the smaller Nova Lite model. The distilled Nova Lite achieved 95.085 percent F1-Score accuracy while reducing production inference costs by 14×.

  2. Why it matters

    Cargo logistics companies handle thousands of bilingual messages daily, extracting critical data like air waybill numbers, flight details, and weights. The traditional trade-off between accuracy and cost made this difficult; IBS Software's approach shows that managed distillation can deliver near-teacher performance (retaining 98 percent of the teacher's accuracy) at a fraction of the operational expense, potentially enabling similar multilingual NER deployments across industries that need cost-effective, real-time processing.

  3. What to watch

    The system identified 23 entity types across two languages and showed a 2.565 percent accuracy gap on Japanese text versus English, primarily due to complex kanji combinations and smaller Japanese training data (150 versus 350 email messages). IBS Software addressed this by augmenting Japanese training data with synthetic examples and applying post-processing rules for known patterns.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

FAQ
How much accuracy did the distilled model retain compared to the teacher model?
The distilled Nova Lite student model achieved 95.085 percent F1-Score overall, retaining 98 percent of the teacher model's performance. The teacher Nova Pro model scored 97.0 percent overall, with English at 97.8 percent and Japanese at 96.2 percent.
What was the training process and timeline?
IBS Software's team of nine researchers and engineers spent approximately 4 months. The student model was trained for 4 epochs over 70 steps, reducing loss from 0.05 to 0.008, using 500 manually annotated cargo email messages (350 English, 150 Japanese) with 23 entity types.
What entities does the system extract from cargo emails?
The system identifies 23 entity types including air waybill (AWB) numbers, flight numbers and routes, weights (gross, chargeable, dimensional), dimensions and volume, commodity descriptions, shipper and consignee information, special handling codes, and delivery instructions.
Amazon AI BlogRead Original Article

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Next articleChatGPT users deepen and diversify globally