AIToday

In Musk v. OpenAI trial, Brockman testifies that Musk pushed for for-profit structure and sought majority control; Zilis reveals Musk attempted to recruit Altman to lead AI lab at Tesla

MIT Technology Review AIMay 9, 20263 min read
In Musk v. OpenAI trial, Brockman testifies that Musk pushed for for-profit structure and sought majority control; Zilis reveals Musk attempted to recruit Altman to lead AI lab at Tesla

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Sign up free →

3 Key Points

  1. Musk filed suit seeking to remove Altman and Brockman from their roles, unwind OpenAI's restructuring to a public benefit corporation, and obtain as much as $134 billion in damages from OpenAI and Microsoft. Musk cofounded OpenAI in 2015 and left in 2018.

  2. Brockman testified that in summer 2017, after OpenAI's AI model beat world-class players in Dota 2, Musk pushed to create a for-profit entity to raise capital for artificial general intelligence (powerful AI that can compete with humans on most cognitive tasks). Brockman said Musk demanded majority equity, the right to choose a majority of board members, and the CEO role. When cofounders proposed equal equity shares, Musk declined, stood up, and walked out with a Tesla painting Sutskever had brought.

  3. Shivon Zilis, a former OpenAI board member, testified that Musk tried to recruit OpenAI CEO Sam Altman to lead a new AI lab within Tesla. OpenAI's lawyer argued Musk is suing to undermine a competitor in the AI race.

  4. Musk's xAI, founded in 2023 and now a division of SpaceX, is expected to go public as early as June at a target valuation of $1.75 trillion. OpenAI's IPO is projected at a valuation approaching $1 trillion.

Discussion

No discussion yet for this article

Stay ahead with AI news

Get curated AI news from 200+ sources delivered daily to your inbox. Free to use.

Get Started Free

Free · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytime

1 minute a day. The AI essentials.

200+ sources · Email / LINE / Slack

Get it free →