
What happened
Morgan Stanley is watching several House and Senate races in the November midterms, saying outcomes could impact planned data center projects. Strategist Ariana Salvatore called the local opposition to data centers a key wedge issue for the 2026 election, while noting it remains a state and local policy risk rather than a federal one for now.
Why it matters
Big Tech firms are pouring enormous sums into data centers for AI, but local opposition is proving effective at stalling or canceling projects. Morgan Stanley has highlighted this backlash as a potential bottleneck for the AI trade, and a growing number of finance professionals see it as a growing risk.
What to watch
The races include Pennsylvania's 8th District, where Rob Bresnahan Jr. introduced a bill to make it harder for tech companies to sue communities over zoning, and Texas, where Ken Paxton faces James Talarico, who has proposed ending the state sales tax break for data centers. The outcomes hinge on whether these candidates win and can act on their positions.
Ask the AI about this article →
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
The core tension is between the enormous investments Big Tech is making in data centers to power AI ambitions and the local opposition that is proving effective at stalling or cancelling projects. Morgan Stanley has flagged this as a key wedge issue for the 2026 election, and sees it as a state and local policy risk rather than a federal one for now. President Donald Trump has framed data centers as a positive economic force for rural communities, but Business Insider reporting has found they can impose extreme costs on struggling economies.
The races on Morgan Stanley's radar show the issue cutting across party lines. In Pennsylvania's 8th District, Republican Rob Bresnahan Jr. introduced a bill to limit developers' ability to sue municipalities over zoning, while in Michigan's 7th District, Democrat William Lawrence supports a federal moratorium and Republican Tom Barrett has filed multiple bills. In the Senate races, candidates in Texas, Michigan, and Ohio have staked out positions ranging from tax break repeals to moratoriums, though in Ohio neither candidate explicitly supports a pause.
The stakes for the AI trade hinge on whether any of these candidates win and can implement their proposals. A wave of successful anti-data center candidates could slow the buildout, while those who support the projects could clear the path for Big Tech's investments. The fact that Morgan Stanley sees this as state and local rather than federal suggests the near-term risk is fragmented across individual districts, but the cumulative effect of multiple local victories could still create significant headwinds for the industry.
For example, today's edition would include:
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Tesla trades at $354.08 with a 369x earnings multiple, a 1.4% operating margin, and negative $1.1 billion free…

Visa has introduced new AI fraud tools and a cybersecurity push, signaling a shift in its investment narrative

Intel is pushing on-premises AI, a move that could quietly change how investors view its core AI investment na…

John Ternus, Apple's next leader, faces a key question: whether the organizational model that made Apple succe…

Merck (MRK) shares rose after positive trial results for its personalized cancer vaccine intismeran autogene…

Greg Abel took over as CEO of Berkshire Hathaway at the start of 2026, and he is actively looking at artificia…
