AIToday
WIRED AIPublished: Jun 30, 2026, 22:00 JST2 min read

Sanders pushes AI wealth tax and data center moratorium

Sanders pushes AI wealth tax and data center moratorium

Key takeaway

  • Senator Bernie Sanders is pushing two major pieces of AI regulation: a moratorium on data center construction and a sovereign wealth fund that would tax large AI companies and distribute proceeds to citizens while giving the public half the seats on AI industry boards.

  • Sanders argues that without intervention, AI—which he calls humanity's most transformational technology—will remain controlled solely by billionaires indifferent to ordinary people's welfare, jobs, and privacy.

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Senator Bernie Sanders, alongside Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, proposed legislation in March to halt data center construction until safeguards are implemented. In June, Sanders announced the American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act, which would tax AI's richest companies and distribute proceeds directly to American citizens. Sanders says the public should own half of AI industry boards to block technologies that cause mass unemployment or endanger privacy.

  2. Why it matters

    Sanders argues AI is being controlled by the world's wealthiest people—including Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg—with no regard for ordinary people's needs, despite AI being "the most consequential, transformational technology in the history of humanity." He points out Congress has passed zero significant legislation on AI to date, and that members fear opposing the industry because it can unleash hundreds of millions of dollars in campaign spending against them.

  3. What to watch

    Sanders's proposals target any company with revenue of $200 million(約320億円) or more. The sovereign wealth fund would direct half of AI's revenue growth to the public, arguing that AI is built on human knowledge—books, poems, scientific work—for which creators have received zero compensation.

Ask the AI about this article →

FAQ

Which companies would be affected by the sovereign wealth fund?
Any company with revenue of $200 million(約320億円) or more, including Microsoft and Google.
Why does Sanders say the public should benefit from AI's wealth?
Sanders argues AI is built on human knowledge—books, poems, scientific work—that creators and publishers contributed without compensation, so the public should share in the financial gains.
What would happen if the sovereign wealth fund were enacted?
Half of the increase in revenue created by AI would go to the people, and half of board seats at AI companies would be held by representatives of the public, who could reject technologies that cause mass unemployment or endanger privacy and children's well-being.

Get AI news like this every morning

For example, today's edition would include:

  • CrowdStrike unveils SafeMind, autonomous red teamingSiliconANGLE AI · 1h ago
  • ASE CEO: AI resource squeeze is short-termDIGITIMES Asia · 1h ago
  • Google signs largest enhanced geothermal deal with FervoYahoo Finance AI · 1h ago

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.

Free · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Next articleLawyer Bill Savitt beats Musk twice in court—Twitter and OpenAI cases