
What happened
Murata Manufacturing stopped accepting new orders for general-purpose MLCCs, prioritizing high-margin AI server models. Delivery times for high-value MLCCs have stretched from 8–10 weeks to over 20 weeks.
Why it matters
AI servers use over 10 times more MLCCs than general servers, and an NVL72 rack can require 440,000 to 600,000 units. Murata's 800億円 investment will only boost capacity by 10–15%, and not until fiscal 2027.
What to watch
Whether Murata's capacity ceiling pushes more demand to competitors like Samsung Electro-Mechanics or emerging silicon capacitor makers. Watch Samsung's 1兆722億ウォン long-term supply contract, its largest single MLCC deal ever.
WHO IT HITSEnterprise IT teams and data center operators sourcing AI server components face longer lead times and potential supply shortages, while procurement managers at general electronics makers may struggle to secure basic MLCC supply as manufacturers prioritize AI orders. Smaller component makers could gain market share as they absorb spillover demand.
Ask the AI about this article →
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
The passive component industry is experiencing a structural shift driven by AI compute demand. MLCCs, long considered a commodity, have become a strategic resource as AI servers require over 10 times more units than general servers. Murata's decision to refuse general-purpose orders reveals that capacity expansion cannot keep pace, with even its 800億円 investment yielding only a 10–15% increase by fiscal 2027. This forces a prioritization of high-margin AI components over legacy products, sending ripple effects through the supply chain.
Competitors are responding aggressively to fill the gap. Samsung Electro-Mechanics secured its largest single MLCC long-term contract at 1兆722億ウォン, while Taiwanese makers like Yageo and 華新科 are absorbing spillover demand. The market is clearly supplier-driven, with inventory at record lows and capacity utilization at 95%. This tightness is not merely cyclical; it reflects a fundamental mismatch between AI's exponential demand and the industry's incremental capacity additions.
Looking ahead, the physical limits of traditional MLCCs in high-frequency applications are opening the door for silicon capacitors. These devices, manufactured using semiconductor wafer processes, offer lower parasitic parameters and better integration with advanced packaging. However, their custom nature — requiring tight alignment with chip architectures and packaging processes — remains a hurdle. The outcome likely depends on whether silicon capacitors can scale beyond niche applications to become a standard option, which would test the dominance of the Japanese ceramic powder supply chain and alter the competitive landscape for passive components.
For example, today's edition would include:
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Michael Burry, famous for The Big Short, is short Nvidia, Palantir and Tesla, and in his Substack newsletter s…

Investors have three creative routes to Anthropic exposure before its expected IPO: buying Alphabet, Amazon, o…

Much of the attention on AI infrastructure buildouts is now tied to sheer compute power, with dominance define…

Barron's reported September 10 that Kepler Computing emerged from stealth with a memory architecture using fer…

Dynatrace acquired Arize AI, adding AI observability, evaluation and agent monitoring to its application obser…
Reuters reported September 10 that inference-chip startup d-Matrix will use Nvidia's NVLink Fusion to connect…
