Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
Sign up free →What happened
McCoy Smith, speaking at an Open Source Initiative webinar, outlined how copyright has been the primary legal foundation for open source licensing, but AI is raising fundamental questions about how copyright applies to training data, the processing that happens inside an AI system, and the output that AI produces.
Why it matters
There is ongoing litigation and debate about whether creators of materials used to train AI have any legal right to object to that training, and whether AI output itself can be copyrighted or patented. The core problem is that the middle step—what happens between input and output inside an AI system—remains legally unresolved, and no clear legal regime yet exists to govern it the way copyright licensing does for traditional open source code.
What to watch
Smith speculated on potential future solutions, including legislative action, contract-based approaches, and public pledges, suggesting that copyright law alone may not be sufficient to keep AI truly open.
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytime
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Log in to join the discussion
Get curated AI news from 200+ sources delivered daily to your inbox. Free to use.
Get Started FreeFree · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytime
