Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
Sign up free →CAD-Bench Lab released a research-grade benchmark (May 2026) running a 28-task pilot subset from a 343-task suite across 10 agents at 5 seeds each, with scoring reported as bootstrapped 95% CIs, worst-case p5, and 2PL IRT ability θ calibrated against task difficulty.
Scoring uses four layers—geometry, engineering, manufacturability, and cognition—with three use-case views that re-weight the layers dynamically; results include a (capability, $/task) Pareto frontier showing which agents are not dominated on both capability and cost axes.
The pilot evaluated 20 categories across the 4 layers, with an aggregate of 431.7 min wall-clock compute; 4 of the 10 agents were human baselines for comparison.
No discussion yet for this article
Get curated AI news from 200+ sources delivered daily to your inbox. Free to use.
Get Started FreeFree · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytime
1 minute a day. The AI essentials.
200+ sources · Email / LINE / Slack