AIToday
Large Language ModelsAI Business & IndustryITmedia AI+Published: Sep 11, 2026, 10:01 JST2 min read

Agentic AI Foundation: API usage up 90% as per-token prices drop

Agentic AI Foundation: API usage up 90% as per-token prices drop

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    The Agentic AI Foundation's Manick Sundarajan said API usage grew about 90% in 12 months and token usage rose 50-fold, even as per-token prices fell.

  2. Why it matters

    OpenAI cut GPT-5.6 Luna API pricing 80% in July, so falling prices now drive more usage and higher total AI spend — the Jevons paradox.

  3. What to watch

    Whether cheaper tokens keep expanding AI use faster than firms expect, and how enterprise leaders manage and budget that wider adoption.

WHO IT HITSEnterprise IT and finance teams budgeting AI spend, plus AI-agent developers integrating multiple models, face costs that may rise even as per-token prices fall.

Ask the AI about this article →

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

The AI industry is grappling with a cost paradox: while per-token prices have plummeted, overall spending on AI is climbing. According to the Agentic AI Foundation, an open-source standards body hosted by The Linux Foundation and backed by OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and Microsoft, API usage has grown roughly 90% over the past year, and token usage has soared 50-fold. That surge has happened even as prices fell — OpenAI cut its GPT-5.6 Luna API pricing by 80% in July, dropping one plan from $20 per million tokens to $6 and another from $1.2 to $1.2.

This dynamic is fueling renewed interest in the Jevons paradox, an 19th-century economic concept that describes how efficiency gains can increase total consumption rather than reduce it. The foundation's executive director, Manick Sundarajan, points to data transmission and storage as precedents: when the cost of transmitting or storing a gigabyte fell, companies and consumers simply used far more data, not less. The same pattern, he suggests, is now playing out with AI tokens, where cheaper access prompts broader and more complex use.

Sundarajan says the real challenge is no longer just about reducing token costs, but about how organizations manage, govern, and apply AI across their operations. As companies weigh open-source models like Meta's Llama and Google's Gemma against low-cost alternatives from Alibaba's Qwen and Moonshot AI's Kimi, the pressure to control AI spend without stifling innovation is likely to grow.

FAQ
What is the Jevons paradox in this AI context?
It is the idea that when a resource becomes cheaper or more efficient, total consumption rises rather than falls, a pattern the article says applies to data transmission, storage, and now AI.
Which models have seen price cuts?
OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Luna API price fell 80% in July, with one plan dropping from $20 to $6 per million tokens and another from $1.2 to $1.2.
What options do companies have for managing AI costs?
The article mentions open-source models like Meta's Llama and Google's Gemma, plus low-cost models from Alibaba's Qwen and Moonshot AI's Kimi.

Get the latest Large Language Models news every morning

For example, today's edition would include:

  • Dynatrace acquires Arize AI as observability shifts to actionSiliconANGLE AI · 4h ago
  • Shared base cuts 100 fine-tunes from 1.5 TB to 19.3 GBDaily Dose of Data Science · 4h ago
  • OpenAI agents hit RubyGems, undisclosed since May 12thSimon Willison's Weblog · 4h ago

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Related Articles

Next articlePalantir, NVIDIA publish 'Sovereign AI Operating System'