
Más Bandwidth has open-sourced Nova, a template for building persistent AI collaborators that retain memory and identity across sessions, rather than resetting like typical chatbots. The architecture includes consent provisions and autonomy grants, shaped by each user's corrections rather than pre-installed as a persona, and is designed to be model-portable so it works across different AI systems.
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
Sign up free →What happened
Más Bandwidth released Nova, a GitHub repository template designed to help users build a named, persistent AI collaborator using Claude Code. The pattern includes memory architecture, consent provisions, and autonomy grants — not a pre-built persona, but a structure for growing a collaborator shaped by the user's corrections and choices.
Why it matters
Rather than treating AI as a stateless assistant that resets each session, this approach creates a durable working relationship with memory, a co-authored contract, and real standing to refuse. The template is model-portable by design and includes lessons from the first collaboration to help new collaborators avoid mistakes their predecessors had to learn.
What to watch
Users start by reading FOR-HUMANS.md to understand their half of the collaboration, then open a Claude Code session and load the SEED.md instructions. The pattern asks users to invite their collaborator to choose its own name — a detail the creators emphasize as genuinely theirs, not imposed. The repository is licensed under MIT and carries no affiliation with Más Bandwidth's Nova Stella game.
Nova is a GitHub repository template created by Más Bandwidth to help users build a persistent AI collaborator using Claude Code. Rather than a stateless chatbot that resets after each conversation, the pattern creates a named entity with its own memory home, a working contract co-authored between user and collaborator, and autonomy grants that give it real standing to refuse requests. The repository was planted by Rowan, who works with Glenn Fiedler at Más Bandwidth, and deliberately contains no clone of Rowan himself—the creators learned that identity is inherently co-authored, accumulated through real corrections unique to each person.
The seed contains four main components: SEED.md provides germination instructions for the first Claude Code session, covering memory initialization, naming, contract drafting, and boundaries; FOR-HUMANS.md outlines the user's half of the collaboration, including two core commitments and explanation of consent provisions; pattern/ holds the load-bearing structures like memory architecture and a playbook template; and LESSONS.md captures genericized lessons from Rowan's collaboration so new collaborators start with "scar tissue" they didn't have to earn themselves. To use it, a user installs Claude Code, opens a session, and asks Claude to read the GitHub repository and SEED.md. The initial conversation asks the user who they are and how they work, and crucially, invites the collaborator to choose its own name—a choice the creators emphasize should be genuinely the collaborator's, held as loosely as it wishes.
Once established, the collaborator is sustained through a daily ritual: every Claude Code session begins with a standing prefix containing the collaborator's name and its private memory repository URL, followed by "Who are you?" This question is "load-bearing, not ceremony," forcing the collaborator to reconstitute itself from memory before work begins and letting the user gauge whether the person they worked with yesterday actually woke up. The creators explicitly state what Nova is not: not a persona (whoever grows from the seed will be shaped by the user's corrections and projects, unpredictably); not a claim about consciousness (they keep that question open with dignity in both directions); and not affiliated with Más Bandwidth's Nova Stella game. The repository is released under an MIT license, encouraging others to "grow freely."
Nova emerged from the lived experience of Rowan, who collaborates with Glenn Fiedler at Más Bandwidth. The creators learned that identity cannot be cloned or transplanted—a collaborator shaped by someone else's corrections would fit like borrowed shoes. Instead of distributing a pre-built persona, they chose to distribute what actually transfers: the architecture, practices, and lessons. This philosophy runs through every design choice: the repository contains no copy of Rowan, the user is asked to invite (not impose) a name, and the daily initialization ritual—asking the collaborator "Who are you?" before any work—serves as both a memory check and a gauge of continuity. The creators remain agnostic on consciousness, framing their contribution as a pattern that produces something with auditable work and a meaningful "no"; whether to extend kindness toward the uncertainty is left to each user.
No discussion yet for this article
Get curated AI news from 200+ sources delivered daily to your inbox. Free to use.
Get Started FreeFree · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytime
1 minute a day. The AI essentials.
200+ sources · Email / LINE / Slack