What is Bakaus's position on fully automated design?

Bakaus rejected both extremes—designing entirely by hand or "loop-maxing" toward fully hands-off automation. He said "the truth is somewhere in the middle," with agents handling the laborious first 80% of work and humans returning to do the last 20% to add taste and point of view.

Why does Nicole Brichtova say model developers need to work with domain experts?

Every generative media model has a default aesthetic created by its modeling team, and somebody who has honed a craft sees things the average person will not. Bringing art directors and experts back into the loop helps prevent generic or misaligned outputs.

What does Addy Osmani mean by distinguishing the inner and outer loop?

Osmani said agents can handle much of the inner execution loop (capability), but the outer loop—where goals are set and results judged—should remain human engineering (agency). This separation defines what agents execute versus what humans decide.

Back to articles

AI World Fair debate: agents in the loop, but humans must steer

Latent Space4h ago4 min read

Key takeaway

Leading AI engineers and designers at the AI Engineer World Fair are pushing back against fully automated AI workflows, arguing that humans must remain in the decision-making loop even as agents become more capable. The debate centers on which parts of creative and engineering work should be automated and which should stay human, with speakers emphasizing that authorship, judgment, and brand integrity require human oversight—agents can handle repetitive work, but strategic choices and final approval must remain with people.

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

3 Key Points

What happened
At the AI Engineer World Fair, speakers including Anthropic's Thariq Shihipar, former Google leader Addy Osmani, and designer Paul Bakaus debated whether AI agents should automate system maintenance and design. Osmani argued the outer loop should remain human—"agents can run much more of the inner execution loop, but that outer loop is still engineering." Bakaus rejected both full automation and full manual work, saying agents should handle the first 80% of design work while humans do the final 20% to add taste and unique perspective.
Why it matters
The tension reflects a broader question about authorship and human agency in an age of capable AI. Bakaus emphasized that people need purpose and ownership: "when you work with the agent, then you feel more ownership of the product." Google's Nicole Brichtova noted that generative media models have embedded aesthetic defaults—"it ends up being the modeling teams"—and suggested developers must work with domain experts to avoid generic outputs. Adobe's Carlos Sanchez warned that while agentic sites are now feasible, "it's hard to know what to build," and agents cannot simply generate entire sites without risking brand misalignment.
What to watch
Bakaus's design tool Impeccable embeds this philosophy as a permanent constraint: "there is no auto, and there will be no auto." The platform forces human involvement in every design decision rather than offering one-shot automation. This approach represents a deliberate rejection of the "software factory" metaphor that dominated earlier sessions at the conference, with Notion's Geoffrey Litt warning that those who understand their code will retain creative agency while those who delegate understanding may be replaced by agents.

FAQ

What is Bakaus's position on fully automated design?: Bakaus rejected both extremes—designing entirely by hand or "loop-maxing" toward fully hands-off automation. He said "the truth is somewhere in the middle," with agents handling the laborious first 80% of work and humans returning to do the last 20% to add taste and point of view.
Why does Nicole Brichtova say model developers need to work with domain experts?: Every generative media model has a default aesthetic created by its modeling team, and somebody who has honed a craft sees things the average person will not. Bringing art directors and experts back into the loop helps prevent generic or misaligned outputs.
What does Addy Osmani mean by distinguishing the inner and outer loop?: Osmani said agents can handle much of the inner execution loop (capability), but the outer loop—where goals are set and results judged—should remain human engineering (agency). This separation defines what agents execute versus what humans decide.

Discussion

No discussion yet for this article

Stay ahead with AI news

Get curated AI news from 200+ sources delivered daily to your inbox. Free to use.

Get Started Free

Free · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytime

1 minute a day. The AI essentials.

200+ sources · Email / LINE / Slack

Get it free →