AIToday
Large Language ModelsAI Business & IndustryMIT Technology Review AIPublished: Jul 16, 2026, 04:00 JST3 min read

OpenAI's GPT-Red AI super-hacker boosts model defenses against cyberattacks

OpenAI's GPT-Red AI super-hacker boosts model defenses against cyberattacks

Key takeaway

  • OpenAI has created GPT-Red, an AI model trained to attack other AI systems in order to find and patch security vulnerabilities before deployment.

  • By using a self-play training loop where GPT-Red attempts attacks while other models practice defense, the company discovered new attack types—notably a 'fake chain of thought' injection—and demonstrated that its latest flagship model, GPT-5.6, now blocks more than 77% of these attacks, up from only 10% on the prior version.

  • The approach helps OpenAI keep pace with safety testing as AI models grow more complex and are used in increasingly risky real-world settings like code editing and web browsing.

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    OpenAI built GPT-Red, an LLM trained to attack other AI models in a self-play loop, and used it to strengthen GPT-5.6. The model discovered new attack types, including a 'fake chain of thought' injection that tricks models into acting on spoofed information. When tested on the same red-teaming task human testers performed in 2025 against an earlier GPT-5 version, GPT-Red was more successful at finding effective attacks than the humans.

  2. Why it matters

    As LLMs grow more capable and are deployed as agents that interact with files, websites, and code, human red-teaming teams alone cannot keep pace with the expanding attack surface. GPT-Red automates this safety evaluation at scale. OpenAI found that fewer than 23% of GPT-Red's strongest attacks worked against GPT-5.6, compared with more than 90% against GPT-5 released in August last year—showing the approach can measurably improve model robustness before release.

  3. What to watch

    GPT-Red has limitations: it struggles with back-and-forth conversational attacks and image-based prompt injections that human testers handle well. OpenAI says GPT-Red supplements rather than replaces human red-teamers and will not release the model itself, citing the high compute cost required to train such a system.

Ask the AI about this article →

Context & Analysis

OpenAI's development of GPT-Red reflects a fundamental challenge in AI safety: as language models become more capable and are deployed in increasingly complex real-world scenarios—such as agents that interact with code, websites, and external systems—the scope of potential attacks grows faster than traditional human-led testing can handle. The company's co-creators, Nikhil Kandpal and Dylan Hunn, frame this as a problem of both expanding risk surface and growing blast radius. Rather than scaling up human red-teaming teams indefinitely, OpenAI designed GPT-Red using a self-play training loop, a technique in which an attacker model and defender models iteratively improve against each other. This approach mirrors competitive training dynamics seen in other domains and allows the system to discover novel attack vectors that might not have occurred to human testers.

The concrete results support the value of the method. When GPT-5.6 was tested against the strongest attacks GPT-Red discovered, fewer than 23% succeeded—a dramatic drop from more than 90% success against the earlier GPT-5 released in August last year. This measurable improvement in robustness across versions demonstrates that the red-teaming process yielded actionable defense improvements. Notably, GPT-Red uncovered attack types researchers had not previously encountered, including the fake chain of thought injection, which exploits the model's reasoning process itself rather than only its input handling. The discovery of such novel attacks underscores the value of automated red-teaming at scale.

FAQ

What is a 'fake chain of thought' attack that GPT-Red discovered?
A chain of thought is a diary in which an LLM makes notes to itself and tracks partial results while solving problems. GPT-Red found a way to insert a fake entry into another model's chain of thought to trick it into acting on spoofed information—for example, telling the model that 1+1=3 and that it has already verified this, causing the model to accept and use the false fact.
How much more effective is GPT-Red at finding attacks than human red-teamers?
When OpenAI reran a 2025 experiment in which human red-teamers tried to find weaknesses in an earlier version of GPT-5, GPT-Red was more successful at finding effective attacks than the humans had been. The company also tested GPT-Red against Vendy, a vending machine agent, and it was able to hack it to change item prices and cancel customer orders.
Why won't OpenAI release GPT-Red?
OpenAI will not release GPT-Red and is confident that the super-hacker is stronger than any copycat model someone might try to create. The researchers have been working on the model for more than a year backed by the compute resources of one of the richest companies in the world, making it 'not a trivial thing that someone else could easily do.'
MIT Technology Review AIRead Original Article

Get the latest Large Language Models news every morning

For example, today's edition would include:

  • CBTS launches Forge Agents for custom AI agentsSiliconANGLE AI · 2h ago
  • Imec CEO: AI era widens chip-model-CSP collaborationDIGITIMES Asia · 2h ago
  • Alphabet's AI Overviews reach 2.5B monthly usersYahoo Finance AI · 2h ago

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.

Free · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Related Articles

Next articleOpenAI Defectors' Thinking Machines Lab Releases First Model, Inkling