
What happened
SC Moatti of Mighty Capital analyzed 576 AI B2B companies that raised $50 million-plus since 2025 and found counter-positioning and network economies are the only two moats that work.
Why it matters
Cornered resources like proprietary data appear in 44% of companies but have the worst multiple at 2.6x, while counter-positioning appears in only 5% yet commands 5.3x—the highest of any power.
What to watch
Whether a well-resourced incumbent could copy a startup's model at a cost higher than the startup's own build cost is the test; 88% of scale-economy capital belongs to OpenAI and Anthropic, so that path is largely closed.
WHO IT HITSFounders pitching VCs and investors screening AI deals will need to show a structural moat—counter-positioning or network economies—rather than citing AI itself, since investors now price proprietary data at the lowest multiple in the dataset.
Ask the AI about this article →
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
SC Moatti's analysis draws on Crunchbase data covering 576 AI B2B companies that raised $50 million-plus rounds since the start of 2025, cross-referenced with Hamilton Helmer's 7 Powers framework and insights from Products that Count's 600,000-plus product leader community. The starting observation is that 97% of products nominated for this year's Products That Count Product Awards are deeply integrated with AI—evidence, in Moatti's view, that AI itself has stopped functioning as a differentiator.
The data separates the powers that pay from those that don't. Counter-positioning shows up in only 5% of companies but commands a median enterprise value of 5.3x per dollar raised. Network economies also appear in just 5% yet command a 4.2x multiple. By contrast, cornered resources like proprietary data and unique IP are far more common at 44% but carry the worst multiple at 2.6x. Switching costs are the most crowded power at 37% with a 4x multiple, but the capital required to reach that stickiness is roughly 10x higher than network economies. Scale economies, excluding OpenAI and Anthropic, see their median multiple collapse from 6.1x to 3.2x, with 88% of the category's capital belonging to those two companies.
The stakes for founders come down to a single diagnostic question Moatti poses: what about your business would survive a competitor who starts today with more capital and a better model? If the answer is a structural feature of the business model or network architecture rather than model quality or data volume, the company is likely to command the 4x to 5x multiples the data associates with these two powers.
For example, today's edition would include:
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Much of the attention on AI infrastructure buildouts is now tied to sheer compute power, with dominance define…

Barron's reported September 10 that Kepler Computing emerged from stealth with a memory architecture using fer…

Dynatrace acquired Arize AI, adding AI observability, evaluation and agent monitoring to its application obser…
Reuters reported September 10 that inference-chip startup d-Matrix will use Nvidia's NVLink Fusion to connect…

Amazon announced Shop the Scene, which lets U.S

Mecka AI, which collects human motion data to train robots, is nearing a round led by Sequoia Capital at a val…
