AI Regulation & Policy
Sep 18, 2026

The Gist
ServiceNow launched new tools to help companies govern AI, while Marc Benioff and Palantir's Alex Karp both urged the industry to adopt self-regulation or face lawsuits and stricter rules. At the same time, U.S. senators asked the FTC to investigate Amazon's and Walmart's AI shopping assistants, and health regulators and drugmakers including Sanofi and Gilead are working through how to validate AI safely. The clear takeaway is that AI oversight is arriving through a mix of corporate self-policing and government pressure rather than any single new law.
Today's Stories
- 1
ServiceNow launches AI Control Tower, Context Engine, Shift Zero for AI governance
ServiceNow introduced AI Control Tower, Context Engine, and Shift Zero, tools for managing AI agent access, identity governance, and security compliance as enterprises expand AI-driven automation across operations. These tools link ServiceNow's AI narrative to concrete spending on governance and compliance rather than just productivity chatbots, giving large clients a way to monitor agent access and apply security policies across workflows.
The near-term swing factor is how quickly customers adopt AI Control Tower without compressing margins as AI infrastructure costs rise. Watch the pace of adoption and whether governance tooling becomes crowded and weakens pricing power.
- 2
Benioff to AI industry: self-regulate or get sued
At Dreamforce, Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff told Fortune that AI companies should be held accountable for risks they create, saying product-liability laws can serve as a legal mechanism. He proposed a Fortune 500–like list ranking companies by ethical standards. Benioff's stance puts the onus on AI makers themselves, contrasting with peers at the same event who advocated pacing frontier models or argued speed and safety can coexist. Product-liability law would give harmed parties a legal route to accountability, mirroring how car makers are held liable for malfunctions.
Whether Benioff's proposed ethics ranking gains traction, and whether AI firms adopt self-regulation before liability lawsuits force the issue. He declined to say whether governments should regulate AI companies.
- 3
FDA, Sanofi, Gilead Weigh AI Readiness and Validation Risk
At the PDA/FDA Conference, the FDA, Sanofi, and Gilead weighed AI readiness and validation risk. The discussion signals that life-sciences firms are treating AI validation as a live risk area, not just a technical detail.
How the FDA and drugmakers resolve validation risk will shape what AI tools can clear regulatory hurdles.
- 4
Palantir CEO Alex Karp calls for "reasonable guidelines" on AI
Palantir CEO Alex Karp told CNBC's "Squawk on the Street" on Thursday that AI needs "reasonable guidelines" that are enforced, and said AI labs may be nationalized so clients don't sue. Karp frames enforcement and builder liability as the core problem, arguing "the first line of defense is you're liable for your own actions" — a stance that would put legal risk on the companies building these systems.
Whether Washington moves on the proposed House bill for a so-called kill switch, and what the Senate does after similar moves faced backlash there.
- 5
Senators ask FTC to probe Amazon, Walmart AI bots
Senators asked the FTC to investigate Amazon and Walmart AI bots over made-in-USA claims on products. The request puts the two retailers' AI shopping assistants under scrutiny for possibly misstating where goods are made.
The FTC has not said whether it will open a probe, so the pressure hinges on how it responds to the senators.
- 6
Senators seek FTC probe of Amazon's Alexa for Shopping, Walmart's Sparky
Two senators asked the FTC to investigate whether Amazon's Alexa for Shopping and Walmart's Sparky disadvantage U.S.-made products and fail to flag misleading labels. If the FTC takes up the request, the two retailers' AI shopping assistants would face scrutiny over how they present products and labels to shoppers.
Whether the FTC opens a formal investigation is the key test, since the request is only a call for a probe and no action has been announced.
What to Watch
Keep an eye on how fast customers adopt Salesforce’s AI Control Tower without squeezing margins as AI infrastructure costs climb, and on whether the crowded field of governance tools erodes pricing power. Also watch whether Benioff’s proposed ethics ranking gains traction, whether AI firms embrace self-regulation before lawsuits force the issue, how the FDA and drugmakers resolve validation risk, whether Washington advances the House “kill switch” bill and how the Senate responds, and whether the FTC opens a formal investigation in response to senators’ calls.
Sources
- How AI Governance Launches At ServiceNow (NOW) Have Changed Its Investment Story
- Salesforce’s Marc Benioff to AI industry: Regulate yourselves or get sued
- FDA, Sanofi, Gilead Weigh AI Readiness and Validation Risk at PDA/FDA Conference
- AI needs to have 'reasonable guidelines,' Palantir's Karp tells CNBC
- Senators ask FTC to probe Amazon, Walmart AI bots on made-in-USA claims
- Amazon, Walmart Face FTC Probe Call Over AI Chatbots And ‘Made In USA’ Claims — AMZN, WMT Stocks In Focus
- An 'AI OPEC' is unlikely
- OpenAI will tell us when the world is ending
- ‘We need sufficient means of control before it is all too late’: King Charles III warns AI players on concerns of ‘existential dangers’
- The AI Superintelligence Slowdown
- The AI ‘Slowdown’ Is an Antitrust Mess
- Is the AI safety debate about safety or control?
- Microsoft exec called AI scraping ‘the largest theft of labor in human history,’ new unredacted filings reveal
- AI governance moves closer to the workflow: theCUBE Insights at Amplify
- Google DeepMind launches think tank to prepare society for AGI
- Trump just explained why an AI agency cannot work. He is right
Share this with a friend
Send today's roundup to anyone who wants to keep up.
Get daily AI news free with AIToday
Today's AI, for Today's work. Email / LINE / Slack.
Sign up free