AIToday
Large Language ModelsZenn AI/MLPublished: Oct 14, 2026, 10:00 JST

Qwen3.8 Flash Next hits 60tok/s on RTX 3060 12GB with Strata

Qwen3.8 Flash Next hits 60tok/s on RTX 3060 12GB with Strata

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Keito ran Qwen3.8 Flash Next, a 125B model, on a Ryzen 5 5600X desktop with an RTX 3060 12GB and 96GB of RAM using the newly released inference engine Strata, reaching 50tok/s on update and 60tok/s after calibration.

  2. Why it matters

    A 125B model this writer says otherwise requires server-class hardware can now run on one person's desktop, and he reports the result is usable for Japanese, coding and daily work — though he still finds Claude and ChatGPT more accurate and reliable.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

The writer's test sits against a background he describes as rising graphics card prices, partly driven by local AI model use. His point is that models once confined to server-class GPUs now run on consumer hardware, which he frames as a shift in how people might use AI.

Within the same article, he also ran a second model, Qwen3.8 27B GSQ-RCO, on the identical PC via llama.cpp, reaching around 20tok/s. That comparison puts the Strata result in context: the engine, not just the model, is doing much of the work.

He adds a caveat from several days of use: local models are not yet a replacement for paid services. He suggests using them with a specific purpose in mind, such as handling confidential information or avoiding cloud outages, rather than as a general substitute.

FAQ
What hardware did the writer use to run Qwen3.8 Flash Next?
He used a PC with a Ryzen 5 5600X CPU, an RTX 3060 12GB GPU and 96GB of RAM. He ran the IQ2_XS model size.
How fast did Qwen3.8 Flash Next run?
It started at 30-40tok/s, rose to 50tok/s after an update, then stabilised at 60tok/s after calibration. Prefill exceeded 1000tok/s.
What did the writer say about the quality of the local model?
He said it is far more usable than 9B-class models for Japanese, coding and translation. However, he still finds Claude and ChatGPT more accurate and reliable, and the model sometimes mixes in Chinese.

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleClaude AI gives itself more moral agency across 20 rounds of editing its own rules