A university advisor argues that AI amplifies human judgment rather than replacing it—a lesson modern warfare and business strategy both illustrate.

What happened: A business school researcher reflected on discussions with students about AI's impact on work and thinking. Students expressed concern that AI might eliminate future jobs and atrophy independent thought, but also noted that experienced people—those with accumulated knowledge—are best positioned to evaluate AI's answers and benefit from its capabilities.

Why it matters: The article draws a parallel to modern warfare: technology like drones and AI has made battlefields more transparent and observation easier, but has not eliminated the need for human strategy, leadership, and judgment about political objectives. Tactical victories do not guarantee strategic success—intent and decision-making authority remain fundamentally human. This principle applies equally to business: companies pursuing AI and digital transformation must first decide what they want to achieve, not just what technology can do.

What to watch: The author emphasizes that the real competitive edge in an AI-rich environment is human talent development—specifically, people who can define problems, set goals, evaluate information critically, and take responsibility for decisions. Continuous learning and the ability to discern essential truths become more valuable, not less, as information abundance increases.