What happened
In a roundup on wwwn.lab's note page, Takasaki Tomoki frames the question as whether we make AI or work so AI can grow, and answers that what survives AI substitution is "history," not "ability."
Why it matters
The pieces gathered here — a browser pet called Mimon, the ALife art project ExCell, the browser novel game "Kanata yori, Haru e" — read as that history being built in public, rather than as credentials.
Summaries like this, every morning.
The page reads less as a single announcement than as a running notebook. Its entries circle one question — whether we are building AI or tending it while it grows — and return to it from different angles: a pet raised in a browser tab, an artificial-life artwork, a voice-and-language essay, a glitch-art series made with ChatGPT.
The line that ties these together is the claim that AI substitution targets "ability" while leaving "history" intact. That reframes the projects listed here: the point is not that a non-engineer produced polished work, but that each piece leaves a trace of having been made. The ALife art project ExCell, described as having completed its implementation, and the browser novel game offered in beta sit alongside that idea rather than above it.
One entry asks whether knowledge is really one's own if it recurs, and another whether meaning can be left behind.
Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
