Linus Torvalds has publicly declared that Linux will not be an anti-AI project, backing the use of AI tools in kernel development and warning critics they can fork the project if they disagree.
The statement settles internal debate over Sashiko, a Linux Foundation AI-powered code review system, which Torvalds acknowledges will reduce maintainers' workload despite some imperfections—a position grounded in technical merit rather than ideology.
What happened
Linus Torvalds, Linux kernel's top-level maintainer, issued a strong statement in favor of using AI tools in Linux development, saying he would "absolutely put my foot down" on the issue. Anyone who objects "can do the open-source thing and fork it. Or just walk away."
Why it matters
The statement settles a live debate over Sashiko, an AI-powered code review system for the Linux kernel developed by the Linux Foundation. Some developers like Roman Gushchin had argued that anti-LLM sentiment was undermining the tool's goal of reducing maintainers' workload. Torvalds' endorsement signals that the kernel project prioritizes technical merit over ideological resistance to AI.
What to watch
Sashiko uses tailored prompts and works with multiple LLM providers to automatically review code patches imported from mailing lists or Git repositories. A guide for kernel maintainers on using Sashiko is available on GitHub.
Ask the AI about this article →
The Linux kernel community has historically been pragmatic about adopting new tools based on their technical contribution rather than ideological purity. Torvalds' statement reflects that culture while directly rejecting a faction—not merely individuals but a broader "anti-LLM stance" he acknowledges exists within some people involved in the project—that sees AI as fundamentally problematic. His framing is notable: he does not deny that AI tools create friction ("painful," "extra work," "embarrassing bugs") but argues that imperfection is not unique to AI and that the solution is not rejection but evaluation on merit. The Sashiko case illustrates why this matters in practice. A code review system that reduces maintainer burden addresses a real constraint in open-source development, where the bottleneck is often human review capacity, not tooling. By positioning himself to "very loudly ignore" ideological objections while keeping the door open to technical critique, Torvalds is steering the project toward pragmatic integration of AI rather than either uncritical adoption or blanket rejection.
For example, today's edition would include:
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Visko raised $10 million in pre-seed funding from Llama Ventures and opened public access to its first foundat…
AI company Runway has unveiled Solaris, the first model in a new category it calls "Interface World Models." I…
Google's AI search gave advice to call emergency services for users alone with an African, Indian, or Pakistan…
John Deere introduced JD, a conversational AI tool that lets farmers ask open-ended questions about their hist…
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said on Fox Business that AI is creating 'hundreds of thousands' of jobs, including in…
Israeli startup DataAgent Ltd
