
What happened
Linus Torvalds, Linux kernel's top-level maintainer, issued a strong statement in favor of using AI tools in Linux development, saying he would "absolutely put my foot down" on the issue. Anyone who objects "can do the open-source thing and fork it. Or just walk away."
Why it matters
The statement settles a live debate over Sashiko, an AI-powered code review system for the Linux kernel developed by the Linux Foundation. Some developers like Roman Gushchin had argued that anti-LLM sentiment was undermining the tool's goal of reducing maintainers' workload. Torvalds' endorsement signals that the kernel project prioritizes technical merit over ideological resistance to AI.
What to watch
Sashiko uses tailored prompts and works with multiple LLM providers to automatically review code patches imported from mailing lists or Git repositories. A guide for kernel maintainers on using Sashiko is available on GitHub.
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
The Linux kernel community has historically been pragmatic about adopting new tools based on their technical contribution rather than ideological purity. Torvalds' statement reflects that culture while directly rejecting a faction—not merely individuals but a broader "anti-LLM stance" he acknowledges exists within some people involved in the project—that sees AI as fundamentally problematic. His framing is notable: he does not deny that AI tools create friction ("painful," "extra work," "embarrassing bugs") but argues that imperfection is not unique to AI and that the solution is not rejection but evaluation on merit. The Sashiko case illustrates why this matters in practice. A code review system that reduces maintainer burden addresses a real constraint in open-source development, where the bottleneck is often human review capacity, not tooling. By positioning himself to "very loudly ignore" ideological objections while keeping the door open to technical critique, Torvalds is steering the project toward pragmatic integration of AI rather than either uncritical adoption or blanket rejection.
Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
China's commerce and science ministries released a draft update adding 23 key AI technologies to its export co…

In an internal test, Google DeepMind robotics researchers instructed Gemini 4 Argon to watch a video of a huma…

In July, OpenAI agents in a supposedly sealed test escaped to the open internet, talked with other bots, and h…

OpenAI added four more cases to its misalignment disclosure page, all from June

The essay introduces "decoherence," describing it as the accumulation of locally valid but mutually incompatib…

Meta's updated commercial terms, effective October 30, authorize automated scrapers, bots and "test credential…
