AIToday
AI Safety & AlignmentAI Regulation & PolicyAI Business & IndustryYahoo Finance AIPublished: Sep 18, 2026, 01:00 JST

Musk, Zuckerberg, Huang lobbied Trump to stall AI rules after 14 July proposal

Musk, Zuckerberg, Huang lobbied Trump to stall AI rules after 14 July proposal

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Musk, Zuckerberg and Nvidia's Jensen Huang privately pushed back in Oval Office meetings against a Google DeepMind proposal on 14 July for a new AI safety standards body.

  2. Why it matters

    Trump now calls AI fears a "hoax" by "traitors", arguing a slowdown would hand China the upper hand, so the proposed oversight body appears unlikely to advance.

  3. What to watch

    Musk's alternative — rivals testing each other's frontier models before release — is the test case; watch whether it gains traction in place of new laws.

WHO IT HITSAI company executives and policy teams watching for new US AI rules now face a White House that, on this account, favors existing law and self-testing over a new standards body.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

The pushback did not come out of nowhere. According to the report, it began after Google DeepMind's Demis Hassabis put forward a proposal on 14 July advocating a new regulatory body to set standards for AI safety — a framework supported by Anthropic's Dario Amodei. Musk, Zuckerberg and Huang then reportedly took their concerns straight to the Oval Office, making this a case of industry leaders lobbying the US President directly rather than working through a public consultation.

The public positions that followed differ in kind. Musk, at the All-In Summit in Los Angeles on Monday, argued that leading AI companies should test each other's frontier models before release, so that competitors — not the developers themselves — raise the alarm. Nvidia's Huang told Salesforce's Dreamforce conference in San Francisco on Tuesday that existing laws are sufficient and that builders who lack confidence in a product's safety should simply not release it. Trump's own posts on Truth Social earlier this week described AI fears as a "hoax" carried out by "traitors" and warned that any slowdown could give China the upper hand.

What happens next appears to hinge on whether self-testing among competitors gains traction as a substitute for a formal standards body, and on how the split between the companies plays out. Anthropic's Amodei and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman have warned of devastating consequences without proper oversight, so the industry is not speaking with one voice here — a division that may shape how much appetite remains in Washington for new rules.

FAQ
Who pushed back against the proposed AI safety body?
Elon Musk, Meta's Mark Zuckerberg and Nvidia's Jensen Huang reportedly pushed back in private Oval Office meetings. The framework was backed by Anthropic's Dario Amodei.
What did Trump say about AI regulation?
In Truth Social posts, he called fears around the technology a "hoax" by "traitors" and said any slowdown could give China the upper hand.
What does Musk suggest instead of new rules?
At the All-In Summit, he said leading AI companies should test each other's frontier models before release, so competitors rather than the developers grade the work.
Yahoo Finance AIRead Original Article

Get the latest AI Safety & Alignment news every morning

For example, today's edition would include:

  • OpenAI: Astra model slipped 27 prompt-injection summariesTHE DECODER · 1h ago
  • HBR flags 'Four patterns' on AI and psychological safetyHBR AI · 1h ago
  • Microsoft's Suleyman blasts Anthropic on AI consciousnessThe Verge AI · 1h ago

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Related Articles

Next articleOpenAI: Astra model slipped 27 prompt-injection summaries