
Only 14% of Japanese firms say generative AI is becoming established.
Sumitomo Chemical, LINE Yahoo, and dip argue against forcing AI everywhere.
Success comes from integrating AI into existing workflows, not adding it on top.
What happened
In a survey by AIsmiley and MMD研究所, 14.0% of companies answered that generative AI is 'gradually becoming established'. Executives from Sumitomo Chemical, LINE Yahoo, and dip discussed what drives company-wide adoption in a Q&A session.
Why it matters
All three firms stress that success is not about blanket deployment. Sumitomo Chemical says generative AI is not optimal for every task; LINE Yahoo's CTO notes that simply layering AI onto existing processes may not deliver sufficient results; dip keeps input and output with humans for quality control.
What to watch
dip shared three lessons: touch and try tools before overthinking, avoid loudly labeling efforts as 'AI', and do not set numeric adoption targets at the outset. Sumitomo Chemical reached a stage where over 50 employees use its AI after phased rollout with security reviews.
Ask the AI about this article →
The body presents a panel discussion where leaders from Sumitomo Chemical, LINE Yahoo, and dip converge on a shared thesis: generative AI should not be treated as a universal tool bolted onto every process. Instead, they advocate for redesigning workflows around the technology's strengths. Sumitomo Chemical's representative frames this as a matter of identifying which parts of a task are better suited to AI versus human judgment, using a human-in-the-loop approach to retain control over outputs.
LINE Yahoo's CTO adds a structural perspective, arguing that merely introducing tools does not drive organizational change. The real work lies in connecting AI to internal systems and data, and nurturing so-called 'champion users' — employees who may not yet use the tools daily but can evangelize from within. dip's lessons, meanwhile, focus on psychology and discipline, warning against both overthinking and over-promising AI adoption targets.
The survey's finding that only 14.0% of companies report generative AI as 'gradually becoming established' suggests that broad adoption remains a challenge for most organizations. The approaches described by these three firms, ranging from phased security-conscious deployment to letting natural usage emerge without preset metrics, appear intended to counter the common failure modes implied by this low figure. The implication, grounded in the body, is that sustainable adoption depends less on technology enthusiasm and more on deliberate integration and human oversight.
For example, today's edition would include:
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
TSMC has doubled down on equipment purchases, citing surging AI demand that is stretching the global chip indu…

Solomon Technology, a Taiwanese AI 3D vision company, is showcasing two key inspection applications at Semicon…

Caterpillar announced a collaboration with FieldAI to deploy physical AI, autonomy, robotics, and NVIDIA-power…

A fictional customer named Maya received a 20% off promotion for ski boots, but the AI missed that her skis ar…

Anthropic's latest model, Claude Fable 5.1, is now available in private preview on Snowflake Cortex AI, with s…

Meta told workers this week that performance reviews will no longer depend on how much they used AI tools
