AIToday
ITmedia AI+Published: Oct 16, 2026, 13:00 JST

Nichiren AI voice guideline demands one year consent caps

Nichiren AI voice guideline demands one year consent caps

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Nichiren announced its generative AI voice usage guideline on October 15, built on three pillars: prior notice and consent, data control, and fair compensation.

  2. Why it matters

    Businesses using actors' voices would need prior approval at every stage, with blanket consent banned and approvals capped at one year, plus separate fees beyond normal performance pay.

WHO IT HITSCompanies developing or operating voice AI services in Japan, as well as talent agencies and production firms handling voice contracts, face a new voluntary industry standard they may need to reflect in consent and data-handling processes.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

The guideline arrives as voice AI that mimics real performers has spread since around 2023. In 2024, a group of voice actors released a video calling for an end to unauthorized use of voices. In 2025, NTT West launched an AI service using voices with actors' consent, showing both protest against unauthorized use and commercialization based on permission moving forward together.

Legal signals have also shifted. The Justice Ministry stated in August 2026 that unauthorized use may constitute a rights infringement, and in September the Tokyo District Court found in a case brought by actor Kenjiro Tsuda that a voice can be protected under publicity rights, although the deletion request was dismissed.

Nichiren says it will keep improving the guideline based on feedback and expand applied cases with partners such as Itochu Group, aiming ultimately to turn it into legislation. At the announcement, vice chairman Michihiro Ikemizu responded to industry pushback by saying things had been "too easy until now" and argued Japan lags other countries in rule-making.

FAQ
What are the three pillars of the guideline?
They are prior notice and consent, data control, and fair compensation.
What must businesses do if consent is withdrawn?
If a voice actor withdraws consent and the business agrees, it must delete the voice data and prompts and stop providing the AI model.
What legal developments are cited as context?
The Justice Ministry indicated in August 2026 that unauthorized use may infringe rights, and a Tokyo District Court ruling in September found voice can be protected under publicity rights, though the deletion request was dismissed.

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Next articleBroadcom pairs Hock Tan AI-spend warning with security push