What happened
A.G. Sulzberger, publisher of The New York Times, discussed the paper's $20 million legal fight against OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement over AI training, as well as the Trump administration's recent subpoenas of Times journalists covering a Qatar-gifted jet intended for Air Force One use. The Times has surpassed 13 million subscribers and maintains reporters in over 150 countries.
Why it matters
Sulzberger frames the lawsuit and press-freedom battles as existential threats to journalism itself. He argues that AI companies depend on the reporting they risk undermining, and that media outlets must enforce their legal rights rather than capitulate to administration pressure—a warning he says applies across the industry. The Times views itself as defending not just its own business but the broader principle that a free people need a free press.
What to watch
Sulzberger cautioned news organizations against rushing into AI adoption without safeguards, citing instances where outlets handed content creation entirely to AI and published false information and invented journalists. He emphasized that humans must remain responsible for everything published, and that AI is a tool, not an autonomous actor.
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
Sulzberger's comments reflect a publisher navigating simultaneous threats to journalism from government and technology. The Trump administration's subpoena strategy—serving reporters at their homes and pursuing their family members' communications—represents what Sulzberger characterizes as the most aggressive press intimidation from a White House in more than a century. He attributes this partly to a chilling effect spreading through newsrooms, where some reporters avoid pursuing stories out of fear their editors will kill them to avoid retaliation, waiting instead for the Times to report first. This dynamic reveals how institutional pressure filters down to individual editorial decisions across the industry.
On the AI front, Sulzberger's caution reflects hard lessons from newsrooms that rashly automated content creation. His insistence that humans remain responsible for all published material directly counters the notion that AI can operate independently—a principle he frames as non-negotiable. The lawsuits against OpenAI and Microsoft sit at the heart of this concern: AI companies built valuable models on journalism the Times and others created, yet those same models now threaten to disintermediate readers from the original reporting. Sulzberger's framing positions the legal fight not as corporate self-interest but as a defense of the economic foundation that allows journalism to function at scale (maintaining 150+ countries of reporting).
Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
