
What happened
Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Greg Casar are crafting legislation to ban artificial "superintelligence" outright. Text is expected in the coming weeks. The bill would also pause advanced AI development and create a Cabinet-level agency.
Why it matters
The proposal is the most extreme AI-related legislation to date, according to the column. It also centralizes more federal power over AI than any prior bill. It sets penalties for advanced AI models at the level of illegally building nuclear weapons.
What to watch
It isn't clear how much support the bill would get while Republican majorities mostly back Trump's pro-AI posture. The bill's progress hinges on whether that support materializes once text arrives in the coming weeks.
WHO IT HITSUS lawmakers and federal agencies would gain sweeping new powers to halt advanced AI work if the bill advances, while American AI developers and data-center operators face penalties comparable to nuclear-weapons violations. Republican majorities in Congress are the main obstacle.
Ask the AI about this article →
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
Sanders has spent much of this year rallying against data centers, mostly over what the column calls overblown concerns about water and electricity usage. He even cosponsored legislation with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for a national data center moratorium — a step that would seriously limit America's ability to keep developing and using AI. His latest proposal with Casar goes further by targeting the models themselves, with penalties set at the level of illegally building nuclear weapons.
The column argues that concerns about rapid AI development aren't completely unfounded, noting projections for how self-improving AI could go wrong even as it points to potential revolutions in cancer screening and drug discovery. But it draws a distinction between regulating AI and calling for progress to grind to a halt. Sanders reveals his true motivation, the column says, when he turns to job losses — citing his April rally remark that AI could displace "half of all entry-level white collar jobs in the next one to five years."
Whether the bill advances at all appears to hinge on Republican support, since the column notes GOP majorities remain mostly rallied behind Trump's pro-AI posture. The column's own reading is that banning innovation doesn't save jobs likely to be lost; it only delays the moment workers have to adjust. For American AI developers and data-center operators, the practical question is whether the bill's text, expected in the coming weeks, translates a rallying cry into enforceable federal tools.
For example, today's edition would include:
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Oracle said Thursday that sales in its closely watched cloud infrastructure business jumped 121% to $7.4 billi…

Marvell Technology is targeting $18 billion in FY2028 revenue, raising its combined FY2027 and FY2028 expectat…

Philip Morris International and WSJ Intelligence unveiled The Cognition Index Research Report, a survey of mor…

Lam Research CFO Doug Bettinger said at the Citi Global TMT Conference that the company raised its calendar 20…

Broadcom's fiscal Q3 2026 AI semiconductor revenue rose 221% from a year earlier to $16.7 billion, and CEO Hoc…

Chatham County police arrested 20-year-old Dieon Love on Monday, accusing him of using AI to create a fake Spa…
