
What happened
Philip Morris International and WSJ Intelligence unveiled The Cognition Index Research Report, a survey of more than 2,500 business professionals in the US, UK, Italy, South Africa and Brazil.
Why it matters
62% say human intuition should take priority over AI in creative work, and 50% say the same for market analysis, meaning professionals still want people deciding even where data drives the work.
What to watch
Only 25% strongly agree their organization has a clear, effective process for fact-checking AI outputs, so the test is whether firms build verification frameworks as AI enters workflows.
WHO IT HITSThis lands on HR and people-development teams, and on managers who set how AI tools are used in creative and analytical workflows — the report points to verification and cognitive-skill development as areas the surveyed professionals say need attention.
Ask the AI about this article →
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
The report comes from an unusual pairing: WSJ Intelligence, the thought leadership arm of The Wall Street Journal's commercial sales organization, ran the study with sponsorship from Philip Morris International, the tobacco and smoke-free products company. WSJ Intelligence describes it as the largest-scale research program it has ever conducted, drawing on more than 2,500 business professionals across the United States, United Kingdom, Italy, South Africa and Brazil, and it maps sentiment from entry-level associates up to the C-suite.
The findings sit alongside each other in an interesting way. The same professionals who are described as increasingly optimistic about AI's role in improving decision-making still say human judgment, ethics, critical thinking and empathy must be actively protected. Moira Gilchrist, PMI's Chief Global Communications Officer, frames the issue with a muscle metaphor: use it or lose it, and the risk is outsourcing thinking to technology. Carolyn Romano, Director of Research at WSJ Intelligence, calls AI an exceptional co-pilot whose long-term success depends on leaders who nurture human insight.
The open question is organizational rather than attitudinal. The survey says only 1 in 4 professionals strongly agree their organization has a clear, effective process for fact-checking AI outputs, so the stakes likely hinge on whether companies actually build those governed, human-in-the-loop processes — a gap that appears to fall to the leaders the report addresses.
For example, today's edition would include:
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Oracle said Thursday that sales in its closely watched cloud infrastructure business jumped 121% to $7.4 billi…

Marvell Technology is targeting $18 billion in FY2028 revenue, raising its combined FY2027 and FY2028 expectat…

Apple researchers presented SimpleDesign, a multi-modal protein design model trained directly in data space wi…

Lam Research CFO Doug Bettinger said at the Citi Global TMT Conference that the company raised its calendar 20…

Broadcom's fiscal Q3 2026 AI semiconductor revenue rose 221% from a year earlier to $16.7 billion, and CEO Hoc…

Chatham County police arrested 20-year-old Dieon Love on Monday, accusing him of using AI to create a fake Spa…
