
A developer has created a self-hosted AI analyst tool that differs from standard "chat with your data" applications by making its reasoning fully transparent.
Rather than returning confident answers without explanation, the tool displays every SQL query it runs, shows the row counts and data sources for each calculation, and automatically checks its own results for errors.
When tested on an HR dataset with a question about Engineering's hiring versus headcount growth, the tool first explained its approach (including noting when a governed semantic model lacked needed data and why it switched to a raw table), then ran each step as readable SQL, and flagged its own potential problems.
What happened
A developer has built an AI analyst tool that displays every SQL query it runs, shows row counts and data sources for each step, and automatically flags its own errors — the opposite of typical "chat with your data" tools that offer confident answers with no transparency.
Why it matters
Business users asking questions about their own data often cannot verify whether an AI's answer is correct. This tool puts the entire working on screen and traces every claim back to the specific query that produced it, letting users audit the AI's reasoning themselves rather than trusting a black box.
What to watch
The tool is self-hosted (users run it on their own infrastructure) and includes a self-checking mechanism that flags problems it detects — though the article's description of this feature is incomplete.
Ask the AI about this article →
The core problem this tool addresses is a common frustration in business analytics: AI systems that answer questions confidently but provide no way for users to verify accuracy. Traditional "chat with your data" tools function as black boxes, leaving users to either trust the output or manually reconstruct the reasoning — a time-consuming and error-prone process. By placing the entire working on screen — including the SQL queries, row counts, and explicit statements about which data sources were chosen and why — this tool inverts the typical trust model. Users can now inspect the logic and data at every step.
The developer's example illustrates the transparency in action. When asked whether Engineering's hiring growth reflected actual headcount expansion or was backfilling departures, the tool first explained its reasoning: it found that the governed semantic model lacked a hires metric, so it deliberately chose to fall back to a raw monthly table instead. This kind of explicit acknowledgment of source limitations and substitution decisions is absent from most AI analytics tools. By combining this transparency with automatic self-checking — where the AI flags its own potential errors rather than relying on users to spot them — the tool attempts to combine convenience with accountability.
For example, today's edition would include:
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Chinese large-model developer Z.ai says it can now support large-scale inference using roughly 100,000 domesti…

Analyst Ming-Chi Kuo says Nvidia has revived the Rubin CPX AI accelerator with a substantially redesigned arch…

A UK study by UK AI Security Institute and Limbic AI surveyed 6,474 British adults

Broadcom's Clayton Donley says companies are doing mission-critical work with AI agents quickly, but without t…
OpenAI released a new evaluation framework on July 17, 2026, urging companies to measure AI ROI by 'useful out…

As AI agents perform real business tasks, 'Agentic Identity' (giving each AI a unique employee-like ID) and 'D…
