AIToday
Large Language ModelsSimon Willison's WeblogPublished: Jul 1, 2026, 10:00 JST

Claude Sonnet 5 launches with 1M token window, but tokenizer inflates costs

Claude Sonnet 5 launches with 1M token window, but tokenizer inflates costs

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Anthropic released Claude Sonnet 5, a new AI model with performance close to its more expensive Opus 4.8 variant. The model has a 1 million token context window and 128,000 maximum output tokens. However, the new tokenizer produces approximately 30% more tokens than Claude Sonnet 4.6 for the same input, effectively raising the price by 30% despite list pricing remaining at $3/million input and $15/million output (with an introductory discount to $2/$10 through 31st August).

  2. Why it matters

    Sonnet 5 offers high performance at lower list prices, but the tokenizer change means real-world costs are higher than they appear. The model is less capable at cyber tasks than Anthropic's more powerful Mythos 5, which allowed the company to release it without US government restrictions. For developers and businesses using Claude, the effective price increase may offset the appeal of lower headline rates.

  3. What to watch

    The tokenizer efficiency varies by language—English text costs 1.42× more per token than Sonnet 4.6, Spanish 1.33×, Python code 1.27×, and Simplified Mandarin roughly the same. Adaptive thinking is enabled by default, and the model uses the same tools and platform features as Claude Sonnet 4.6.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

FAQ
How much does Claude Sonnet 5 cost?
List pricing is $3/million input tokens and $15/million output tokens, with an introductory discount of $2/$10 through 31st August. However, the new tokenizer produces approximately 30% more tokens than Sonnet 4.6 for the same input, effectively raising costs by 30%.
What is Claude Sonnet 5's context window size?
It has a 1 million token context window and 128,000 maximum output tokens.
How does the tokenizer efficiency differ by language?
The same input text produces 1.42× more tokens for English, 1.33× more for Spanish, 1.27× more for Python code, and approximately the same cost for Simplified Mandarin compared to Sonnet 4.6.
Simon Willison's WeblogRead Original Article

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleAI startups warned: plan for success or infrastructure will collapse