AIToday
Large Language ModelsOpen-Source AIImport AIPublished: Oct 12, 2026, 22:00 JST

US and European open-weight models trail Chinese rivals like GLM-5.3

US and European open-weight models trail Chinese rivals like GLM-5.3

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Reflection's Beam (501B parameters) and Mistral's Mistral Large 4 will be open-weight releases, but benchmark scores — such as DeepSWE 1.1 of 44.4 for Beam versus 61 for GLM-5.3 — show them behind Chinese models.

  2. Why it matters

    These releases signal that Western labs are trying to re-enter the open-weight frontier, but they still lag Chinese counterparts, according to the reported scores.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

The announcements from Reflection and Mistral come as the US and Europe try to regain ground in open-weight AI. The US has largely fallen off the open-weight frontier, partly because Meta stopped making good LLaMA models. Reflection's Beam, despite being trained on 6,144 GB300 NVL72 GPUs for four weeks, still trails Chinese models like GLM-5.3. Mistral, described as Europe's leading AI developer, plans to release Mistral Large 4 by the end of the month. Its scores show it will likely be the strongest Western open-weight model upon release, but still less powerful than Chinese ones.

The competitive gap is evident in benchmark results. Beam achieves token efficiency—comparable to GLM-5.2 while using 3–4× less inference compute—but its raw scores on DeepSWE 1.1, GPQA Diamond, and MCP Atlas are lower than GLM-5.3. Mistral Large 4 is preferred in CAD and STEM tasks in internal tests, but performs on par or close to GLM-5.3 in finance and coding. These results suggest that while Western labs are making strides, catching up to Chinese open-weight models remains a challenge.

FAQ
What are Beam and Mistral Large 4?
Beam is a 501 billion parameter MoE model from Reflection, and Mistral Large 4 is an open-weight model from Mistral. Both are planned for release.
How do they compare to Chinese models?
Beam scored 44.4 on DeepSWE 1.1 versus 61 for GLM-5.3, and Mistral Large 4 scored 62 versus 68 for Kimi K3 on the same benchmark.

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleProtiviti wins Microsoft AI Inner Circle spot for second consecutive year