A systematic test of six notable open-source AI detectors found that four cannot reliably hit a 0.5% false-positive rate. One model scored over 0.9999 on 26% of ordinary human web text, and the old OpenAI RoBERTa detector performed worse than a coin flip on modern AI text.
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
For example, today's edition would include:
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Tencent's Hunyuan Speech team and university researchers introduced Gander, which splits real-time conversatio…
Epoch AI and Ipsos surveys found the share of US adults using AI on at least six of seven days rose from 8 per…
AAA AI launched a multi-agent system connecting local runtimes like Ollama or cloud APIs under one orchestrati…
Cambridge researchers interviewed 27 former members of Boko Haram's two factions, ISWAP and JAS, who described…
Meta's AI assistant Muse was downloaded over 900,000 times in its first week, according to Sensor Tower, but a…
Cybersecurity experts told The Verge they worry more about generative AI in the hands of bad actors than rogue…
