AIToday
RoboticsAI Stocks & MarketsAI Business & IndustryYahoo Finance AIPublished: Aug 5, 2026, 01:01 JST4 min read

Tesla Stock May Outpace SpaceX as Musk Bets on Robots Over Rockets

Tesla Stock May Outpace SpaceX as Musk Bets on Robots Over Rockets

Key takeaway

  • An investment analyst views Tesla as a better buy than SpaceX among Elon Musk's companies, positioning Tesla as a physical AI empire betting on Optimus robots and supporting infrastructure (Terafab, xAI compute) rather than a carmaker.

  • Both firms trade at extreme valuations (Tesla near 300.0× trailing P/E; SpaceX valued at $1.5 trillion) that are difficult to justify until robotics and space initiatives generate material revenue.

  • The analyst expects Tesla to move higher first if Optimus succeeds, since SpaceX's longer-term projects (asteroid mining, lunar manufacturing) depend on robotics working first.

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    An analyst argues Tesla is better positioned than SpaceX among Elon Musk's public companies, citing Tesla's pivot toward physical AI (Optimus robots, Terafab hardware, xAI compute) rather than vehicle sales, while SpaceX pursues satellite connectivity (Starlink) and lunar ambitions.

  2. Why it matters

    Both companies trade at valuations that are extremely difficult to justify using traditional financial metrics—Tesla at roughly 300.0 times trailing price-to-earnings—because their timelines for commercializing robotics, asteroid mining, and lunar manufacturing remain uncertain. For investors, this means volatility will likely persist until these ventures produce cash flow.

  3. What to watch

    Whether Optimus robots can reach commercial viability; SpaceX's next Starship launches and earnings disclosures; and whether Tesla's near-term spending on AI infrastructure can eventually translate into profit-generating robotics business rather than ongoing cash burn.

In Depth

Read the full story

In recent weeks, both Tesla and SpaceX shares have declined sharply, putting pressure on investors bullish on Elon Musk's enterprises. The core challenge is valuation: both companies operate at the frontier of technology (AI robotics, space exploration, satellite connectivity) in ways that traditional financial models struggle to capture. Tesla, trading at roughly 300.0 times trailing price-to-earnings, appears extremely expensive unless one accepts the premise that AI and robotics will eventually generate enormous earnings. SpaceX, privately valued at $1.5 trillion, faces an even steeper valuation hurdle given the speculative nature of projects like asteroid mining and lunar manufacturing. The analyst argues that Tesla should be understood as a physical AI empire rather than a carmaker. The company's investments in Optimus (a humanoid robot), Terafab (hardware to support AI inference), and xAI (Musk's AI intelligence venture) all support this narrative. From this view, Tesla's aggressive spending is not wasteful but foundational—building the infrastructure needed for a robotics-driven economy. Electric vehicles and robotaxi services are secondary products compared to the underlying bet on AI and robotics dominance. SpaceX, by contrast, pursues a longer and more speculative path. Starlink (satellite internet) appears positioned as a near-term cash cow, while Colossus data centers and Terafab supply compute and hardware. The ambitious moonshots—asteroid mining, lunar manufacturing, robots on the moon—depend on technologies that are even further from commercialization. Critically, the analyst observes that SpaceX's most transformative projects may ultimately depend on robotics breakthroughs, which means Tesla's success with Optimus becomes a prerequisite for unlocking SpaceX's full potential. Given this interdependence and different timelines, the analyst favors Tesla as the better near-term opportunity. If Optimus achieves the necessary capabilities, Tesla stock could move higher ahead of SpaceX, since a working robotics platform would both prove the underlying technology and unblock SpaceX's longer-term ventures. The analyst acknowledges that betting against Elon Musk has historically been unwise, noting that Musk has a track record of attempting to make even far-fetched projects work. However, he also stresses that both stocks will remain highly volatile and difficult to value until these companies begin converting their infrastructure spending into measurable cash flow from robotics, satellite services, or space-based manufacturing.

Context & Analysis

Both Tesla and SpaceX represent extreme valuation cases that defy conventional financial analysis. Tesla trades at roughly 300.0 times trailing price-to-earnings, a multiple that assumes massive future earnings from robotics and AI—businesses that do not yet generate meaningful revenue. SpaceX, valued at $1.5 trillion, faces an even greater challenge: investors must somehow factor in speculative ventures like asteroid mining and lunar manufacturing into its financial picture. The analyst's argument rests on a reframing of Tesla's identity: rather than viewing the company as burning cash on unprofitable cars and robotaxi experiments, he positions it as building foundational infrastructure (compute, hardware, intelligence) needed to launch a robotics business in the coming years. This shift in perspective helps explain why Musk would justify such aggressive spending despite near-term losses. For SpaceX, the thesis is similar but more distant—projects like Starlink offer nearer-term cash generation, but the truly transformative bets (asteroid mining, lunar manufacturing) require robotics breakthroughs, which Tesla must achieve first. The analyst's conclusion that Tesla may "catch that bid higher ahead of SpaceX" reflects a timing argument: Tesla's Optimus milestone, if reached, unlocks value sooner and also de-risks SpaceX's more ambitious plans by proving robotics work at scale.

FAQ

What is Tesla's main business focus according to the analyst?
The analyst views Tesla not as a carmaker but as a physical AI empire focused on Optimus robots, Terafab (AI hardware), and xAI compute infrastructure, with electric vehicles and robotaxis as secondary to the AI revolution.
How is SpaceX valued?
SpaceX is valued at $1.5 trillion (though the analyst notes this could change depending on the firm's earnings).
Why is Tesla potentially better positioned than SpaceX right now?
The analyst believes Optimus robots represent a nearer-term monetization opportunity for Tesla, whereas SpaceX's projects (asteroid mining, lunar manufacturing, advanced space ventures) depend on robotics working first and have longer, more uncertain timelines.
Yahoo Finance AIRead Original Article

Get the latest Robotics news every morning

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.

Free · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytime

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Related Articles

Next articleSwedish-Finnish Monava raises funding for AI drone detection

The AI news that matters, in one minute each morning.

Sign up free