AIToday
Large Language ModelsQiita 機械学習Published: Nov 15, 2026, 13:00 JST

Darwin-Prediction-Weather tops every lead time on 2026 weather board

Send on LINE
Darwin-Prediction-Weather tops every lead time on 2026 weather board

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    VIDRAFT's Darwin-Prediction-Weather posted the lowest error of all scored models for daily max/min temperature, max wind speed and precipitation at 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-day lead times on its 2026 board, with ECMWF AIFS second in every cell.

  2. Why it matters

    The result places a blended forecasting approach ahead of national and international models like ECMWF AIFS and NOAA AIGFS on a daily, publicly verifiable record, which may make it a reference point for forecast accuracy comparisons.

  3. What to watch

    The board updates daily from records starting January 1, 2026, with forecasts for up to 10 days ahead across 24 cities on six continents.

WHO IT HITSMeteorologists and forecast users comparing model accuracy, such as weather-sensitive operations teams, now have a daily-updated public scoreboard to check which model performs best for specific elements and lead times.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, every morning.

Context & Analysis

Forecasting has long relied on physics-based models that solve atmospheric equations on supercomputers, while AI models trained on historical weather data have joined national agencies over the past three years. The leaderboard addresses the practical question of which to trust for tomorrow, three days out, or a week ahead by scoring every model on the same cases: only days and cities where all models issued a forecast. VIDRAFT's Darwin approach combines multiple strong models with skill-based weights, adds location-specific corrections for temperature and wind, and trains only on observations confirmed before the forecast being scored, so no future information enters. Beyond the 2026 board, Darwin was evaluated on WeatherBench 2, Google Research's standard benchmark for AI weather models, and recorded the lowest error in all 15 evaluated cells under the 2020 deterministic protocol, covering 2 m temperature, 500 hPa geopotential, and 850 hPa temperature at 1-, 3-, 5-, 7-, and 10-day lead times. The forecast files were published and submitted to the WeatherBench 2 team.

FAQ
Which models are compared on the leaderboard?
The board scores ECMWF IFS and AIFS, NOAA GFS and AIGFS, DWD ICON, JMA GSM, ECCC GEM, MET Norway, and Darwin-Prediction-Weather.
What metric is used to rank the models?
Models are scored by root mean square error (RMSE) against ERA5 reanalysis, with smaller values indicating better accuracy.
How far ahead do the forecasts go?
The leaderboard evaluates forecasts for up to 10 days ahead across 24 cities on six continents.
Qiita 機械学習Read Original Article
Send on LINE

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleYudkowsky and Irving debate superalignment at ILIAD III Conference