
What happened
On a personal disaster-supply app that had passed a 253-item OWASP ASVS review two weeks earlier, Cloudflare's skill surfaced 18 candidate issues; a second AI rejected 5, left 13 needing more checks, and confirmed 0 vulnerabilities.
Why it matters
The second AI's job is to challenge rather than trust the finder ("this candidate was not written by you. Disprove it"), and the report itself contained errors such as pointing to test files that don't exist, so raw AI findings appear to need human follow-up.
Summaries like this, every morning.
The run is an unusually concrete look at how a two-AI audit behaves in practice. The finder produced 18 candidates on a codebase of 255 web-side TypeScript files and 18 API routes, and 5 were dropped once a second AI tried to knock them down. But the human still had work: the report contained mistakes such as pointing to test files that do not exist, and 7 descriptions had to be corrected.
The setup itself shaped what could be found. The developer excluded the docs/ folder that held the earlier ASVS judgment records, to keep the audit independent, but that folder also held the design documents needed to judge specifications. The scope covered only the web side, so the mobile app was never checked.
Compared with the earlier 253-item ASVS review, which checked requirements one by one, this skill traces code paths looking for risky routes. It overlapped with known issues, raised paths not directly examined before, and showed that some explanatory notes from the ASVS record applied to only part of the processing. The pass verdict did not change, but the notes needed revisiting. The 13 open items are being triaged into three groups: deciding specifications, checking cloud settings, and reproducing behavior locally.
Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
As Anthropic, Meta, Google, Amazon and Microsoft meet faith leaders — Anthropic cites "more than 15 religious…

Anthropic added to its terms of service a ban on "persistent, targeted abusive or cruel" behavior toward Claud…

The developer behind agentcells, a personal project that splits work into 'cell' units (triage, implement, rev…

The developer wired a Stop hook, Hook-CodexGate.js, that reads the conversation log and blocks Claude Code onc…

Using django-oscar's stock-allocation fix as a case study, an AI read the code against two Laws — stock alloca…

TechCrunch rounded up notable AI wearables, including Bee ($49.99 pendant), Friend ($129 companion), Limitless…
