AIToday
Large Language ModelsAI Safety & AlignmentThe Verge AIPublished: Sep 10, 2026, 01:00 JST1 min read

OECD PISA: General AI use linked to worse scores

OECD PISA: General AI use linked to worse scores

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    The OECD's 2025 PISA study found students who never use AI generally outperform AI users in science, after adjusting for socioeconomic status.

  2. Why it matters

    AI for summarizing or writing caused relatively worse results, while weekly general use boasted a small edge. Monthly or weekly users did better than daily or near-never users.

  3. What to watch

    PISA suggests AI boosts learning when students are trained to assess output quality, rising for all moderate users. The study hinges on how schools teach AI use.

WHO IT HITSEducators, school administrators, and EdTech companies designing AI study tools will be affected by this data as they seek methods that promote productive learning rather than reducing it.

Ask the AI about this article →

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

The OECD's latest PISA results, based on data collected in 2025, represent the first major look at student performance since AI usage became widespread. While overall AI use appears negatively correlated with science scores, the details are more nuanced: performance varied based on the specific task, frequency of use, and whether students were taught to assess AI-generated information. Andreas Schleicher, the OECD's director for learning and skills, suggests learning involves productive cognitive struggle, which technology can either enhance or undermine.

The study also highlights a digital divide, with AI use more common among advantaged students, likely tied to hardware, internet, and paid tools. The international gap is wide: over 95% of Vietnamese students reported AI use, compared to just 60% in Japan.

The path forward may involve fostering the kind of moderate, intentional use that the study hints could be beneficial. The data suggests educational outcomes may depend on embedding critical assessment skills into instruction, so that students engage with AI rather than letting it replace intellectual effort.

FAQ
What did the PISA study test?
It tested 15-year-old students in science, math, and reading, drawing from over 760,000 students in 91 countries.
What types of AI use were associated with worse performance?
Using AI for summarizing texts or drafting writing assignments was related to relatively worse results.
Where was AI use most and least common?
Over 95 percent of Vietnamese students reported using AI tools, compared to just 60 percent in Japan.

Get the latest Large Language Models news every morning

For example, today's edition would include:

  • DeepSeek V4.1-Flash: 763B model beats V4 Pro on AA Index 40Latent Space · 2h ago
  • Dynatrace acquires Arize AI as observability shifts to actionSiliconANGLE AI · 8h ago
  • Shared base cuts 100 fine-tunes from 1.5 TB to 19.3 GBDaily Dose of Data Science · 8h ago

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Related Articles

Next articleAWS Ray Serve DLC replaces TorchServe for inference