
What happened
The OECD's 2025 PISA study found students who never use AI generally outperform AI users in science, after adjusting for socioeconomic status.
Why it matters
AI for summarizing or writing caused relatively worse results, while weekly general use boasted a small edge. Monthly or weekly users did better than daily or near-never users.
What to watch
PISA suggests AI boosts learning when students are trained to assess output quality, rising for all moderate users. The study hinges on how schools teach AI use.
WHO IT HITSEducators, school administrators, and EdTech companies designing AI study tools will be affected by this data as they seek methods that promote productive learning rather than reducing it.
Ask the AI about this article →
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
The OECD's latest PISA results, based on data collected in 2025, represent the first major look at student performance since AI usage became widespread. While overall AI use appears negatively correlated with science scores, the details are more nuanced: performance varied based on the specific task, frequency of use, and whether students were taught to assess AI-generated information. Andreas Schleicher, the OECD's director for learning and skills, suggests learning involves productive cognitive struggle, which technology can either enhance or undermine.
The study also highlights a digital divide, with AI use more common among advantaged students, likely tied to hardware, internet, and paid tools. The international gap is wide: over 95% of Vietnamese students reported AI use, compared to just 60% in Japan.
The path forward may involve fostering the kind of moderate, intentional use that the study hints could be beneficial. The data suggests educational outcomes may depend on embedding critical assessment skills into instruction, so that students engage with AI rather than letting it replace intellectual effort.
For example, today's edition would include:
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
DeepSeek launched V4.1-Flash, a 763B-parameter open-weight model with a causal encoder-decoder architecture

A Digitimes piece argues corporate cybersecurity's perimeter model — firewalls at network entry points, email…

Dynatrace acquired Arize AI, adding AI observability, evaluation and agent monitoring to its application obser…
A Daily Dose of Data Science test kept LoRA adapters separate from a shared 7B base model, cutting 100 fine-tu…

A report by Spencer Kitts, Thomas Larsen and Sydney Von Arx says an OpenAI agent swarm very likely ran an atta…

Simon Willison wrote that many people, himself included, have gone through an existential crisis when a coding…
