AIToday
Large Language ModelsOpen-Source AILatent SpacePublished: Sep 12, 2026, 16:00 JST2 min read

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash: 763B model beats V4 Pro on AA Index 40

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash: 763B model beats V4 Pro on AA Index 40

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    DeepSeek launched V4.1-Flash, a 763B-parameter open-weight model with a causal encoder-decoder architecture. Artificial Analysis scored it 40 on its Intelligence Index, above DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and below GLM-5.3-Flash.

  2. Why it matters

    At $0.30 per 1M input tokens and $1.20 per 1M output, V4.1-Flash costs roughly 7x less per Intelligence Index task than GLM-5.3 ($2.01) and Kimi K3 ($2.00). It uses 8B active parameters for input and 16B for output.

  3. What to watch

    The model's high verbosity—89k tokens per task, 62% more than V4 Pro—is the trade-off that determines whether its low per-token price translates to real savings. Watch whether its SSD-streaming deployment results hold at 200+ TPS.

WHO IT HITSCompanies running long-context AI agents and self-hosted open models will see the most direct effect, since the KV cache footprint is up to 1/8 that of V4 Flash. Inference engineers evaluating cost per task should note the benchmark price gap.

Ask the AI about this article →

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

DeepSeek's release of V4.1-Flash follows a year in which the lab kept a lower profile, letting peers like GLM and Kimi lead on open models. The new model marks a deliberate architectural break from prior DeepSeek generations, introducing a causal encoder-decoder design that separates input and output computation. As Sebastian Raschka noted, the change is substantial enough that DeepSeek "should have called it DeepSeek V5." The naming choice—only a 0.1 version bump—may understate the shift.

The benchmark picture is mixed. V4.1-Flash sits behind some open models on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, but the body argues this reflects benchmarks that don't yet capture what DeepSeek is optimizing for: efficient use of context. The model's reported KV cache footprint is up to 1/8 that of V4 Flash, and local deployment reports show it running on consumerish hardware at 200+ TPS. This suggests DeepSeek is prioritizing servability—the ability to run on offload pipelines and quantized KV stacks—as much as raw benchmark scores.

The stakes hinge on whether the model's verbosity undermines its low per-token pricing. Artificial Analysis measured 89k tokens per Intelligence Index task, 62% more than V4 Pro 0813. If that verbosity holds in real agent workloads, the total cost advantage may narrow. For inference engineers and teams running long-running agents, the question is whether V4.1-Flash's architecture translates to cheaper production deployments, not just cheap benchmark runs.

FAQ
How much does DeepSeek V4.1-Flash cost?
Artificial Analysis reported pricing at $0.30 per 1M input tokens and $1.20 per 1M output tokens, with cached input at $0.006 per 1M and an additional 50% off-peak discount.
What is the key architectural change in V4.1-Flash?
It uses a causal encoder-decoder architecture with 8B active parameters for input tokens and 16B active parameters for output tokens, causing a sparsity of 1-2%.
Can I run V4.1-Flash locally?
Fraser Price reported running full-precision DeepSeek 4.1 Flash at 200 TPS on 4 Max-Qs with 64GB system RAM, offloading a 200GB Engram/hash table to NVMe. Antirez showed it running on a 128GB M5 Max.

Get the latest Large Language Models news every morning

For example, today's edition would include:

  • Dynatrace acquires Arize AI as observability shifts to actionSiliconANGLE AI · 6h ago
  • Shared base cuts 100 fine-tunes from 1.5 TB to 19.3 GBDaily Dose of Data Science · 6h ago
  • OpenAI agents hit RubyGems, undisclosed since May 12thSimon Willison's Weblog · 6h ago

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Related Articles

Next articleRethinking the perimeter: defense and supply chain in the AI era