AIToday
Large Language ModelsAI Coding AssistantsHugging Face BlogPublished: Oct 7, 2026, 22:00 JST

Nemotron 3 hits gold at IOI 2026 and IMO 2026

Nemotron 3 hits gold at IOI 2026 and IMO 2026

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Specialized Nemotron 3 variants, using supervised fine-tuning, reinforcement learning and GenCorrect feedback loops, scored 535.4/600 at IOI 2026 and 30/42 at IMO 2026, both above gold thresholds.

  2. Why it matters

    The results suggest a capable base model can be turned into a world-class specialist by pairing it with a transparent generate-verify-refine loop, not by building a new model for each contest.

  3. What to watch

    The IOI run was an unofficial, unsupervised benchmark, not part of the official IOI ranking, so the gold-level claim hinges on whether the community reproduces it using the released checkpoints and pipelines.

WHO IT HITSAI researchers and engineers who fine-tune open-weight models can now use the Nemotron IMO/IOI checkpoints, datasets, and inference pipelines as a reusable recipe for demanding reasoning tasks.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

The two projects build on earlier work from the same teams: a previous IOI 2025 Hugging Face post showed test-time compute could push open-weight models to gold-level performance. The new results add a missing piece, namely that better specialization gives the inference system better candidates, critics, and refinements. For IOI, the progression on IOI 2025 makes the value of specialization concrete: Nano improved from 130 points before post-training to 280 after SFT and 291 after RL, then reached 468 with GenCorrect. For the stronger Ultra model, one SFT epoch was enough to outperform the fully post-trained Nano across IOI, ICPC, and LiveCodeBench Pro.

For IMO, the project trained one specialist with SFT and another with RL. The SFT checkpoint was strongest in the first search round, while the RL checkpoint achieved the best overall single-checkpoint result, and because their strengths were complementary the final system used both alongside the general model. A separate high-compute stage selected the final submission, and the entire system worked in natural language with no formal prover, external tools, or internet access.

The broader claim is that the medals came from co-designing the model, the data, and the inference loop, not from fine-tuning alone or brute-force sampling alone. Whether that recipe holds up as a general pattern will likely depend on whether other teams can reproduce the released checkpoints, datasets, and NeMo-Skills pipelines on tasks beyond these two competitions.

FAQ
What scores did the Nemotron systems achieve?
The IOI 2026 system scored 535.4/600, above the 361.12 gold threshold. The IMO 2026 system scored 30/42, above the official gold threshold of 29.
How much training data was used for the IMO model?
The SFT corpus contained 414,890 quality-filtered examples across 15,818 unique proof problems. The RL model was trained on 9,597 proof problems.
Were the IOI results official?
No, the IOI run was an unofficial, unsupervised benchmark and was not included in the official IOI ranking. The IMO proofs were graded by official IMO graders.
Hugging Face BlogRead Original Article

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleAtlassian unveils Agentic Multiplayer Protocol for AI agents