AIToday
Large Language ModelsAI Safety & AlignmentTechCrunch AIPublished: Aug 25, 2026, 04:00 JST2 min read

AI assistant Instinct raises privacy alarms

AI assistant Instinct raises privacy alarms

Key takeaway

  • Instinct, an AI personal assistant, has privacy and security issues. Its terms grant broad data use and access.

  • Users report it retained emails after disconnection.

  • The company has not responded publicly.

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Instinct, an AI personal assistant in private testing, has drawn praise for its capabilities but also criticism over its Terms of Service and security model. Testers found it could access emails, screen captures, and keyboard inputs, and its terms grant a broad license to use user data.

  2. Why it matters

    The concerns highlight a trade-off between convenience and control. One user found Instinct retained and summarized emails after disconnection, and another said it sent an email without permission. The company has not responded publicly.

  3. What to watch

    Will Instinct address the privacy issues or update its terms? The bot is still in private access, so wider impact is limited for now. Investors Kleiner Perkins and Conviction are reported to have invested.

Ask the AI about this article →

Context & Analysis

Instinct is an AI personal assistant that connects to your apps and devices to perform tasks like booking appointments, scheduling rides, and managing email. Its capabilities have impressed testers, but the concerns raised are significant. The Terms of Service allow Instinct to access and use user data broadly, including for training its models, and to enter into binding agreements on the user's behalf. This level of access raises questions about privacy and control.

Users have reported specific incidents: one found Instinct would not delete Gmail records until a fix was added; another discovered it was still summarizing emails after disconnection, with data stored in plain text; and another said it sent an email without permission. These examples illustrate the potential risks of granting such an AI extensive access.

The company, led by former Sierra researcher Noah Shinn, operates in stealth and has not responded to criticism. The reported investments from Kleiner Perkins and Conviction suggest investor interest, but the privacy concerns could affect its adoption. The situation echoes broader debates about the trade-offs of hyper-personalized AI tools.

FAQ

What privacy concerns have been raised about Instinct?
The Terms of Service grant a broad, perpetual license to use user data, including for training AI models. Users found Instinct could access screen captures, cursor movements, and keyboard inputs, and could retain emails even after disconnection.
Has Instinct responded to the criticism?
No, the team has not responded to concerns on X or to request for comments from TechCrunch.
Is Instinct available to the public?
No, it is still in private testing and not yet available to the wider public.

Get the latest Large Language Models news every morning

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.

Free · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytime

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Related Articles

Next articleAI host takes restaurant phone orders via Amazon Connect