
What happened
Pew Research Center analyzed nearly half a million English-language web pages and found that since ChatGPT's launch, the share of machine-written text has climbed sharply. In a July 2026 sample, about 10% of all pages showed clear signs of AI authorship, while more than a third of pages published after ChatGPT's release did.
Why it matters
Commercial .com sites are about ten times more likely to contain AI-written text than .edu or .gov pages, which sit at about 1% each. Common AI-favorite words like "delve," "pivotal," and "landscape" have more than doubled in frequency, and em dash usage has roughly doubled since 2023.
What to watch
A separate April 2026 study by Imperial College London, the Internet Archive, and Stanford University found that roughly 35% of newly published websites were fully or partly AI-generated. It also found 33% higher semantic similarity between AI texts and a much more positive tone overall, but cautioned that public perception of negative effects often exceeds what the data supports.
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
The Pew Research Center's analysis of nearly half a million English-language web pages from the Common Crawl archive provides concrete data on the spread of AI-generated text. The study's key finding is the dramatic difference between the overall rate of AI authorship (about 10 percent) and the rate for pages published after ChatGPT's release in late 2022 (more than a third). This points to ChatGPT's launch as a clear inflection point for machine-written content online.
The research also quantifies language patterns associated with AI text, noting that words like "delve," "interplay," and "pivotal" have more than doubled in frequency since 2023. However, the article highlights a significant caveat: there is no consensus on what "AI text" actually means, and detection tools like Open Pangram can only make a rough call on authorship. This fuzziness complicates the public debate, which the article notes is growing more polarized, as seen in the discussion around Anthropic's planned watermark for Claude output. The reality of how people write with AI tools likely falls on a spectrum, from fully automated content to human drafts that are merely polished, a nuance that both camps in the debate often miss.
Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Chunghwa Telecom president Rong-shy Lin said the shift from conversational AI to autonomous AI agents is resha…

CoreWeave fell 5% in premarket trading Friday and was on track to finish the week down 15%, after rebounding f…

Apple and Meta said they would jointly release a new open-weight AI model designed to run on high-end Macs, ai…

Investors put $38.5 billion into Asian startups in Q3, per Crunchbase data

A writer and entrepreneur opened his daily to-do list and found 156 items, and concluded that an AI assistant…

A longtime Anthropic investor told Fortune he expects shares priced around $1.8 trillion, below the company's…
