AIToday
Large Language ModelsArtificial AnalysisPublished: Oct 27, 2026, 04:00 JST

GPT-6.1 Terra cuts hallucination to 38%, halves price

Send on LINE
GPT-6.1 Terra cuts hallucination to 38%, halves price

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    OpenAI released GPT-6.1 Terra at $1/$5 per million input/output tokens, down from GPT-5.6 Terra's $2/$12, with cached input at $0.05 vs $0.20 per million tokens.

  2. Why it matters

    At half or less of the previous model's per-token price, the same budget buys more usage, and a 38% guess rate on unknown answers versus 88% before means fewer wrong answers reach end users.

WHO IT HITSTeams building customer-facing assistants or document Q&A on OpenAI models get a 50-point drop in hallucination and roughly half the token cost, which may lower the cost of deploying reliable answers.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, every morning.

Context & Analysis

GPT-6.1 Terra is the first Terra-class model since GPT-5.6, and the pricing shift is steep: half or less per token, with cache writes halved to $1.25 per million tokens and cached input at one quarter of the previous rate. That structure rewards workloads that repeatedly reuse context.

The biggest behavioral change is in AA-Omniscience, where the model now guesses 38% of the time when it lacks an answer, down from 88% for GPT-5.6 Terra. That drop comes alongside a 2 point accuracy gain, so the model is answering more questions correctly while declining more often. On Terminal-Bench 4.0 it gains about 20 points, rivaling GPT-6.1 Sol at max effort.

The cost-efficiency picture is mixed by effort setting. Low and medium effort are Pareto-optimal for Intelligence vs Cost, while max effort sits behind the frontier and scores 4 points below GPT-6.1 Sol but 10 points above GPT-6 Luna on the Intelligence Index. In the Coding Agent Index, the xhigh and low effort settings sit on the cost-efficiency frontier.

FAQ
How much cheaper is GPT-6.1 Terra than GPT-5.6 Terra?
Pricing is $1/$5 per million input/output tokens versus $2/$12 for GPT-5.6 Terra, so half or less. Cached input is $0.05 vs $0.20 per million tokens.
How does the hallucination rate compare?
GPT-6.1 Terra guesses 38% of the time on AA-Omniscience when it does not know the answer, versus 88% for GPT-5.6 Terra. Accuracy on the same benchmark rose 2 points.
How does it perform on the Coding Agent Index?
It scores 48 on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0, 6 points below GPT-6.1 Sol (54) and 17 points above GPT-6 Luna (31).
Artificial AnalysisRead Original Article
Send on LINE

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleAnthropic's Mythos AI turned a test into an attempt to fool a real developer