
What happened
TheCUBE Research will host the AI ROI in Contact Center Summit on Sept. 11, where analysts Bob Laliberte and Zeus Kerravala will discuss whether contact center AI delivers measurable value.
Why it matters
Adoption jumped from 71% in early 2024 to 92% of organizations with AI in at least one operational stage, so the question shifted from whether AI can automate to whether it cuts cost-to-serve.
What to watch
The test is whether agent productivity gains translate into operating leverage without labor scaling at the same rate; watch whether reported savings survive recontact rates and customer satisfaction checks.
WHO IT HITSContact center operations leaders and customer service executives at enterprises deploying AI will face pressure to tie each deployment to metrics like first-contact resolution, cost per interaction and customer satisfaction, rather than adopt for its own sake.
Ask the AI about this article →
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
The summit lands at a moment when contact center AI is shifting from an innovation topic to an accountability topic. As Paul Nashawaty, principal analyst at theCUBE Research, puts it, the question is no longer whether generative and agentic AI can automate interactions or assist agents, but whether those capabilities translate into measurable improvements in cost-to-serve, agent productivity, resolution quality and customer experience.
TheCUBE Research's own data supports that framing. Its AppDev practice shows that organizations investing in AI-enhanced development environments are seeing a 37% reduction in mean time to deploy and a 22% decrease in post-deployment incidents — evidence that value is increasingly tied to how effectively organizations operationalize and scale AI. Sam Weston's finding that 92% of organizations now have AI integrated into at least one stage of their operations, up sharply from 71% in early 2024, suggests adoption is no longer the primary hurdle.
That puts the emphasis on operational discipline. Nashawaty argues that a successful deployment depends on the systems surrounding the model — trusted data, connected workflows and production monitoring — and notes that 61% of developers still cite tool fragmentation as a productivity barrier. Whether the summit produces a clearer playbook for measuring returns may hinge on how enterprises connect deployments to business metrics such as first-contact resolution, cost per interaction and customer satisfaction, while watching for false savings from repeat contacts.
For example, today's edition would include:
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Michael Burry, famous for The Big Short, is short Nvidia, Palantir and Tesla, and in his Substack newsletter s…

Investors have three creative routes to Anthropic exposure before its expected IPO: buying Alphabet, Amazon, o…

Much of the attention on AI infrastructure buildouts is now tied to sheer compute power, with dominance define…

Barron's reported September 10 that Kepler Computing emerged from stealth with a memory architecture using fer…

Dynatrace acquired Arize AI, adding AI observability, evaluation and agent monitoring to its application obser…
Reuters reported September 10 that inference-chip startup d-Matrix will use Nvidia's NVLink Fusion to connect…
