AIToday
Large Language ModelsAI Business & IndustryTechCrunch AIPublished: Oct 18, 2026, 10:00 JST

Meta pulls scraping clause from business terms after Nieman Lab scrutiny

Meta pulls scraping clause from business terms after Nieman Lab scrutiny

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Meta removed a clause from its updated commercial terms that legal experts told Nieman Lab could let it scrape any publisher's site with a Meta business account and use that content to train its AI models.

  2. Why it matters

    A Meta spokesperson had said the terms only covered ads and business products and did not change how Meta uses web crawlers, so the removal appears aimed at quieting publisher concern rather than a change in crawling, per the statement.

WHO IT HITSPublishers and website operators who hold Meta business accounts are the group most directly affected, since the removed language had been read by legal experts as potential permission to scrape their domains and train AI models on the content.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

The episode began with a routine-sounding update to Meta's commercial terms of use. The language said Meta could use any content from a business account's domains, web pages, or URLs to provide, develop, improve, research, train, and maintain the integrity of Meta products and services. Legal experts interviewed by Nieman Lab described that as a remarkable provision that could give Meta permission to scrape the site of any publisher holding a Meta business account and use the content to train its AI models — a reading that landed against the backdrop of continuing copyright cases against AI companies, including Meta, even after Meta defeated a high-profile infringement suit last year. Meta pushed back on that reading at the time, with a spokesperson saying the updated terms did not reflect a change in how the company crawls the web. The Verge now reports the provision has been removed, and Meta's statement frames the fix as clarification: the consolidated crawling terms only applied to its ads and business products, and the company has now said so in the terms themselves, adding that it does not change how Meta uses web crawlers. The sequence suggests the wording, rather than the crawling practice, was what drew scrutiny — a distinction publishers reading the terms may find worth tracking.

FAQ
What exactly did the removed clause say Meta could do?
It said Meta could use any content from a business account's domains, web pages, or URLs to provide, develop, improve, research, train, and maintain the integrity of Meta products and services.
Did Meta admit the terms changed how it crawls the web?
No. A Meta spokesperson insisted the updated terms did not reflect a change in the way Meta crawls the web, and the company said the provision only applied to its ads and business products.
Who reported the provision and its removal?
Nieman Lab interviewed legal experts who called the provision remarkable, and The Verge reported that the provision has now been removed.

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleKonami's Hideki Hayakawa: AI won't shake game market