AIToday
Large Language ModelsOpen-Source AIAI Business & IndustryYahoo Finance AIPublished: Aug 16, 2026, 10:00 JST4 min read

Open-weight AI models threaten pricing, but cloud giants stay profitable

Open-weight AI models threaten pricing, but cloud giants stay profitable

Key takeaway

  • Morgan Stanley analysts found that while lower-cost open-weight AI models will pressure pricing and returns for model developers, large cloud providers like Amazon and Alphabet should continue generating attractive returns by monetizing the computing infrastructure needed to run these models.

  • The bank estimates hyperscalers could achieve 23% to 39% ROIC from renting GPU capacity, sustained by scarce computing power, higher usage volumes, efficiency improvements, and revenue from connected services like managed APIs and storage.

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Morgan Stanley analysts assessed how lower-cost open-weight AI models—which users can download and run on their own infrastructure—will reshape returns for AI companies. The bank estimates model providers could still achieve 20% to 60% ROIC from owned Nvidia GB300 infrastructure at $1.75 per million tokens, while hyperscalers renting GPU capacity could see 23% to 39% ROIC depending on hourly pricing.

  2. Why it matters

    Open-weight models' lower prices and flexibility are expected to drive adoption among enterprises and smaller businesses, but will push token prices down and pressure model laboratories to improve throughput and differentiate services. Morgan Stanley maintained Overweight ratings on Amazon and Alphabet, reasoning that these hyperscalers can monetize scarce computing capacity at lower cost than competitors, offsetting margin pressure through higher usage volumes and connected services revenue (managed APIs, databases, storage, security).

  3. What to watch

    Investors should monitor Meta Platforms' Muse models and Alphabet's Gemini Flash products for signs of pricing pressure, adoption trends, and throughput improvements—metrics that will determine whether hyperscaler returns hold up as competition intensifies.

In Depth

Read the full story

Morgan Stanley analysts published an assessment of how the emergence of open-weight AI models—software that users can download, customize, and deploy on their own infrastructure—will affect profitability across the AI ecosystem. The core finding is that while lower-cost open-weight models will pressure token pricing and returns for model developers, hyperscalers (large cloud providers) should maintain attractive returns because they control the scarce computing infrastructure required to run these models at scale.

The bank modeled two scenarios. Model providers using one gigawatt of owned Nvidia GB300 infrastructure could generate returns on invested capital of 20% to 60%, assuming token prices of roughly $1.75 per million tokens and throughput of 2,000 to 3,500 tokens per second per GPU. Hyperscalers renting out GPU capacity could achieve ROIC of 23% to 39%, depending on hourly pricing. These figures assume token prices will fall as open-weight competition increases, yet the returns remain economically viable.

Morgan Stanley identified four reasons these returns should persist despite lower pricing. First, computing power is scarce—enterprises cannot easily provision the infrastructure themselves and will rely on cloud providers for open-weight inference workloads. Second, lower-cost models are expected to drive much higher usage volumes, and hyperscalers can adjust capacity prices dynamically to capture profit growth even if percentage margins compress. Third, cloud providers and model developers are continuously improving token throughput through faster chips, more efficient interconnections, better model architectures, and request-batching software. Amazon and Alphabet additionally deploy proprietary chips like Trainium and tensor processing units to reduce their cost of supplying compute. Fourth, open-weight model access can serve as a loss leader that attracts higher-margin spending on connected services—managed APIs, GPU rentals, databases, storage, and security tools.

On the basis of this analysis, Morgan Stanley maintained Overweight ratings on Amazon and Alphabet. The analysts highlighted that these companies possess the scale, proprietary technology, and service ecosystems to monetize scarce computing capacity at lower cost than smaller competitors. Investors are advised to watch Meta Platforms' Muse models and Alphabet's Gemini Flash products as early indicators of pricing pressure, adoption trends, and whether throughput improvements will be sufficient to sustain returns in a lower-price environment.

Context & Analysis

The debate around open-weight AI models hinges on a simple tension: lower prices threaten the margins of model developers, but they may strengthen the position of the infrastructure providers underneath. Morgan Stanley's analysis resolves this by separating the two businesses. Model laboratories face real pressure—token prices are expected to fall, forcing them to compete on throughput and differentiation rather than pricing power alone. Yet the hyperscalers that own or rent GPU capacity stand to benefit from the shift. As open-weight models become cheaper and more accessible, adoption should accelerate, and the computing power required to run them becomes a bottleneck that only well-capitalized cloud providers can fill.

The bank's four economic drivers all point to a similar conclusion: scarcity and scale work in the hyperscalers' favor. Computing remains hard to provision; higher usage volumes let cloud providers adjust pricing dynamically rather than eat margin compression; efficiency improvements (faster chips, better software, proprietary silicon like Trainium and tensor processing units) reduce cost per token served; and low-priced model access can anchor a broader relationship with enterprises that spend more on ancillary services. This logic favors Amazon and Alphabet, which own both the chips and the distribution networks to capture value at multiple layers.

FAQ

What is ROIC and what levels does Morgan Stanley forecast?
ROIC (return on invested capital) measures profit generated per dollar invested. Morgan Stanley estimates model providers could achieve 20% to 60% ROIC from owned Nvidia GB300 infrastructure, while hyperscalers renting GPU capacity could see 23% to 39% ROIC depending on hourly pricing.
Why could open-weight models still be profitable for hyperscalers despite lower prices?
Four factors support sustained profitability: computing power remains scarce and enterprises need cloud providers for open-weight inference; lower-cost models drive higher usage volumes, allowing hyperscalers to grow total profit despite lower margins; cloud providers and model developers are improving token throughput via better chips and software; and low-priced model access acts as a loss leader attracting more profitable cloud spending on managed APIs, databases, storage, and security tools.
Which companies did Morgan Stanley recommend to investors?
Morgan Stanley maintained Overweight ratings on Amazon and Alphabet, citing their ability to monetize scarce computing capacity at a lower cost than competitors.
Yahoo Finance AIRead Original Article

Get the latest Large Language Models news every morning

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.

Free · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytime

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Related Articles

Next articleAlibaba's Qwen AI models hit 3B downloads, top Meta and Google

The AI news that matters, in one minute each morning.

Sign up free