AIToday
Large Language ModelsAI Safety & AlignmentAI Business & IndustryTHE DECODERPublished: Aug 30, 2026, 22:01 JST

AI helps grades, not learning: study

AI helps grades, not learning: study

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    A randomized experiment with 1,053 freshmen at Bocconi University found that GPT-4o helped students earn significantly better grades on a business assignment, scoring nearly a full point higher on a 1-to-5 scale.

  2. Why it matters

    The study suggests that current grading systems reward polish and structure, not understanding. Since AI can produce expert-like work, grades alone may not reflect what students actually learn.

  3. What to watch

    A short lesson on causal reasoning didn't raise traditional scores but encouraged more diverse ideas and deeper thinking. Combining it with GPT-4o didn't improve scores further, and no follow-up test measured retained knowledge.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

This study adds to a growing body of evidence that AI can improve task performance without improving underlying skills. A prior analysis of over 500,000 US college grades found that top grades increased most in writing and programming courses with heavy homework after ChatGPT's launch. Controlled experiments showed that when AI was removed, participants performed worse than a control group, especially those who used GPT for direct answers. A 30-month study of 26,000 students in China found homework improved but exam scores dropped, with entrance exam results 18 to 24 percent lower over the long term.

The Bocconi experiment highlights a tension in education: current grading rewards conventional, polished answers, not originality or deep reasoning. The authors argue for changing grading criteria to explicitly reward originality and reasoning. However, as the article notes, this would likely require systemic changes. The study also has limitations: it involved only freshmen at one university, randomization was at the class-section level, and some measures were evaluated by AI models, including from OpenAI, which was involved in the research. Whether the GPT advantage reflects actual learning or just better output remains an open question.

FAQ
Did the causal reasoning lesson improve grades?
No, it didn't raise traditional scores. In fact, work from those students scored slightly worse on average, but they produced more diverse ideas and explained their reasoning more.
What did the study measure besides grades?
It also measured argumentation quality, number of ideas, idea diversity, and text properties. The grading rubric correlated with higher scores for more ideas and coherence but penalized falsifiability and divergence from peers.

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleS. Korea's aging population may blunt AI boom wealth