An essay argues AI-driven acceleration has pushed arXiv submissions past what peer review can handle, and proposes a Robin Hanson-style idea futures market to sort good research from slop.
Summaries like this, every morning.
Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
The author fed the 'desired candidate profile' text from 145 job postings to Claude, turned the extracted labe…
Researchers de-duplicating leak-site data say alleged ransomware attacks reached nearly 3,000 over the summer…
Jamie Dimon said JPMorgan Chase is "not gonna allow just any" outside AI agent inside the company, warning "Yo…
OpenAI is dissolving its standalone robotics team and folding researchers into the main research team under Ch…
Jacob Coxon, a former OpenAI and Anthropic researcher, cited an Anthropic IPO roadshow slide showing pre-train…
Internal data first reported by The New York Times show only 42% of Alpha School students met its goal of lear…
