
What happened
The Department of Education issued guidance last week separating recreational from instructional technology and telling schools to judge AI products by demonstrated learning outcomes, not usage.
Why it matters
Until last week, policy lumped all screen time into one bucket; now vendors face demands for independent evaluations, and evidence must be built into renewals, not just purchases.
What to watch
The test is whether schools can fund implementation after pandemic money ran out — Alabama requires AI instruction for the class of 2032, and evaluation efforts hinge on trained adults.
WHO IT HITSSchool district technology leaders and edtech vendors will feel this first, since procurement decisions now need independent evaluations and evidence tied to renewals. Corporate IT and L&D teams running AI rollouts face the same standard, with 95% of generative AI pilots having produced no measurable return.
Ask the AI about this article →
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
For example, today's edition would include:
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Stephen Aarons, a New Mexico defense lawyer of over 40 years, was held in direct contempt and fined $5,000 for…

Mastercard, Visa and Ant International unveiled a Know-Your-Agent initiative on Thursday via the Monetary Auth…

A citizen cold-emailed a Finnish MP, met him for lunch, and the MP submitted a written question four days late…

Oracle proposed investing in 2 gigawatts of renewable energy for New Mexico as part of its $165 billion Projec…

Parents and children in Illinois and California filed a proposed class action in Chicago alleging Meta extract…

Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan told CNBC he would do nothing about distillation, and told TechCrunch he wants smal…
