AIToday
Large Language ModelsAI Coding AssistantsZenn AI/MLPublished: Nov 9, 2026, 06:00 JST

OKR等級コンパス built with Claude hits 18/18 after promptfoo testing

Send on LINE
OKR等級コンパス built with Claude hits 18/18 after promptfoo testing

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    The engineer built OKR等級コンパス with Claude and サスケWorks, then tested it using promptfoo; accuracy rose from 16/18 to 18/18 and unstable groups fell from 1 to 0.

  2. Why it matters

    The tool's grade-matching judgments became more accurate and consistent, showing that systematic benchmarking can reveal and fix AI errors that would otherwise go unnoticed.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, every morning.

Context & Analysis

The project started from a shared concern: how to make goal-setting and evaluation feel fair to employees while still supporting company growth. The engineer focused on the evaluation side, aiming to replace subjective judgment with AI-assisted checks based on explicit criteria.

The core of the tool is a two-axis scale that rates a goal by the size of the problem it addresses and the scope of people it involves. The lower of the two axes determines the goal's grade level. This scale was refined from an earlier eight-axis version that proved unable to distinguish between goals effectively.

A key finding came from benchmarking: the AI consistently misjudged goals containing phrases about consulting others, reading them as involving more people than intended. This was traced to ambiguous wording in the grade definitions, not an AI flaw. After clarifying the boundaries, the tool's accuracy reached 18/18 and its results became stable across repeated runs. The engineer notes that the scale itself is a provisional model, not an officially approved company standard.

FAQ
How was the tool tested?
The engineer used promptfoo, an open-source tool for evaluating prompts, to run the same grade-judgment task multiple times. The initial version passed 16 out of 18 cases, and after refining the grade definitions it passed 18 out of 18 with no unstable results.
What error did promptfoo reveal?
The AI misread phrases like 'consulting with senior colleagues' as a higher grade level, because the boundary between grade levels was ambiguous. Writing clearer distinctions fixed the error.
Send on LINE

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleAI firms have sold $300 billion of stock in 2026, with $100 billion more on tap