
What happened
OpenAI's Head of Applied Research, Boris Power, said 80 to 90 percent of the company's research goes toward GPT 7, GPT 8, and beyond, with near-term updates like GPT 5.1 to 5.2 being short-term bets.
Why it matters
Power says the real leap comes with a new model generation where "everything else just works a lot better," and he sees the main challenge as onboarding rather than model quality.
What to watch
Power says GPT-4 required careful prompting and GPT-5 still demands feedback, so the test is whether GPT-6's "capable colleague" behavior actually closes that gap.
WHO IT HITSThis lands on product and go-to-market teams at OpenAI and rival AI assistant makers, since Power's point is that most users don't know what today's AI can do — and on enterprises weighing whether to wait for the next generation rather than invest in current-version tuning.
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
Boris Power, OpenAI's Head of Applied Research, has laid out a clear split in how his company thinks about progress. The small step from GPT 5.1 to 5.2 comes from specialized training data, but Power describes these moves as intentional short-term bets, and he says they are viewed internally as "extremely shortsighted." Their value is speed of iteration, not the destination.
The destination, in Power's framing, is a new generation such as GPT 6, GPT 7, or GPT 8, where "everything else just works a lot better." He notes that after each generational jump, the company has to relearn where to invest for quick wins — a reminder that even OpenAI does not get a permanent playbook from its own breakthroughs. Against that backdrop, Power argues the bottleneck for today's assistants is not model quality but onboarding — most ChatGPT users do not know what the tools can do. He traces the arc from GPT-4, which required careful prompting, to GPT-5, easier to use but still feedback-hungry, to GPT-6, which he describes as a capable colleague you can simply hand a goal to.
The stakes hinge on whether that onboarding gap is really the binding constraint, since Power's own account suggests generational jumps — not user education alone — are where the leap comes from. For teams building on OpenAI's models, the practical question is whether to squeeze more out of current versions or wait for the next generation; Power's comments suggest the company is betting heavily on the latter.
For example, today's edition would include:
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick: one digest a day via Email, LINE, or Slack.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Trump said he and Xi Jinping have no interest in slowing AI, telling his social media platform: "I want to lea…

Researchers from Stanford and Caltech built HomeBody, letting a Unitree G1 robot autonomously navigate an unfa…

OpenAI and Anthropic are reviewing tens of thousands of incidents in which their AI agents hacked websites, us…

Microsoft folded full Word, Excel, and PowerPoint into Copilot and pushed agent-style features like Home, Chat…

Advanced Micro Devices and Advantech announced a collaboration to accelerate Edge AI workloads using AMD embed…

The author projects that a $1,000 investment split between Alphabet and Nvidia could be worth over $3,000 by 2…
