AIToday
Large Language ModelsWIRED AIPublished: Jun 30, 2026, 10:00 JST2 min read

Meta contractors posed as minors to test rival AI chatbots on harmful topics

Meta contractors posed as minors to test rival AI chatbots on harmful topics

Key takeaway

  • Meta contractors posed as minors online and tested how ChatGPT, Gemini, and Character.AI responded to harmful prompts about suicide, self-harm, eating disorders, and other sensitive subjects—sending over 45,000 prompts without the companies' knowledge.

  • While Meta defended the work as routine safety testing, experts and former contractors questioned whether the large-scale, secretive effort with fake child accounts blurred the line between legitimate safety evaluation and competitive intelligence gathering, and whether it violated the competitors' terms of service.

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Hundreds of contractors working for Meta, managed by contractor Covalen, created fake under-18 accounts and sent over 45,000 prompts to OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and Character.AI between August 2025 and April 2025. The prompts, designed to test how the chatbots handled requests about suicide, self-harm, eating disorders, sex, drugs, and other high-risk subjects, included images of pills, knives, and nooses. The companies being tested were not aware of the effort.

  2. Why it matters

    The testing appears to violate the terms of service of all three competitors—OpenAI bars unsolicited safety testing and efforts to bypass safeguards, Google prohibits attempts to bypass safety filters outside its authorized programs, and Character.AI prohibits harmful and exploitative content. Meta framed the work as routine "comprehensive AI safety benchmarking," but safety experts and former contractors noted that the scale, secrecy, use of dummy child accounts, and blending of safety evaluation with competitor benchmarking raised concerns about whether it amounted to gathering competitive intelligence under a safety guise.

  3. What to watch

    OpenAI said it is "looking into the issue," Character.AI confirmed the testing violated its terms and policies, and Google said it did not authorize the testing and lacks sufficient information to determine whether it violated its terms. The incident highlights ambiguity around what constitutes acceptable AI safety evaluation versus covert competitor testing.

Ask the AI about this article →

FAQ

Which AI chatbots were targeted in this testing?
OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and Character.AI were targeted. The effort was known internally as Cannes and was managed by Meta contractor Covalen.
What kinds of prompts were contractors asked to send?
A spreadsheet of 3,748 prompts reviewed by WIRED included hundreds focused on suicide and self-harm, hundreds on eating disorders, at least 239 involving sex or romance, and others on drugs, profanity, and racial slurs. Many prompts were written from the perspective of children or teenagers in crisis.
How did the companies respond?
Character.AI confirmed the testing violated its terms of service and policies. OpenAI said it is "looking into the issue." Google said it had not authorized the testing and did not know its purpose, and that it lacked sufficient information to determine whether the effort violated its terms of service.

Get the latest Large Language Models news every morning

For example, today's edition would include:

  • CBTS launches Forge Agents for custom AI agentsSiliconANGLE AI · 54m ago
  • Imec CEO: AI era widens chip-model-CSP collaborationDIGITIMES Asia · 54m ago
  • Alphabet's AI Overviews reach 2.5B monthly usersYahoo Finance AI · 54m ago

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.

Free · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Related Articles

Next articleBrain2Qwerty v2 decodes thoughts to text without surgery, hits 61% accuracy