AIToday
Zenn AI/MLPublished: Oct 31, 2026, 06:00 JST

Explainer: エージェント(Agent) splits into reactive, deliberative, hybrid

Send on LINE
Explainer: エージェント(Agent) splits into reactive, deliberative, hybrid

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    An explainer defines an agent as a system that autonomously repeats a perception–decision–action loop and identifies three implementation paradigms: reactive (IF-THEN rules), deliberative (internal world model plus planning), and hybrid.

  2. Why it matters

    The taxonomy gives non-specialist readers a simple filter for classifying agent products by whether they act on fixed rules, plan from an internal model, or switch between the two modes.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, every morning.

Context & Analysis

The explainer frames agents as a concept that has been a central research subject in computer science since the 1990s, with applications spanning robots, game AI, and simulations. Its three-paradigm breakdown traces a progression in how much internal state a system carries: reactive agents decide with no memory, deliberative agents maintain a world model and plan, and hybrid agents switch between the two depending on urgency.

The piece also maps decision-making mechanisms to applications in a table, pairing rule-based methods with game NPCs, optimization with robot control, game-tree search with pre-AlphaGo game AI, machine learning with AlphaGo and autonomous driving, and reinforcement learning with game AI and robots. It then walks through AlphaGo's agent structure as a concrete case, describing neural-network value evaluation, Monte Carlo tree search for candidate moves, and a policy network before the selected move is executed.

Modern examples extend the same loop to large language model agents such as AutoGPT, which take a user instruction and external information as input, decompose it into intermediate tasks, select tools, and plan an execution order before generating text and calling tools. The explainer closes by listing open challenges — transferability beyond a single game, sample efficiency compared with human learning, explainability of chosen actions, and convergence guarantees in multi-agent learning — without offering a timeline for resolving them.

FAQ
What is the difference between a reactive and a deliberative agent?
A reactive agent maps sensor input directly to action through IF-THEN rules with no intermediate memory, while a deliberative agent keeps an internal model of the world and generates a plan before acting.
What is a hybrid agent?
A hybrid agent combines a reactive component for emergencies, such as immediate obstacle avoidance, with a deliberative component that handles destination setting and route planning in normal situations.
Which application is given as an example of a deliberative agent?
The explainer cites shogi and chess AI, robot planning, and partially autonomous driving as applications of deliberative agents.
Send on LINE

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Next articleMicrodosing the spirit of Anthropic: inside AI labs' skewed views