AIToday
AI Safety & AlignmentAI Regulation & PolicyMIT Technology Review AIPublished: Sep 25, 2026, 19:00 JST

Pentagon seeks $30.3 million for AI lie detector "Polygraph+"

Pentagon seeks $30.3 million for AI lie detector "Polygraph+"

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    The Department of Defense requested $30.3 million over five years for "Polygraph+" or "Polygraph Next," run by the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA).

  2. Why it matters

    The program would use AI scoring and "standoff sensing" to vet employees and detect insider threats, but experts say it may repeat decades of failed lie-detection attempts.

  3. What to watch

    The budget is not yet approved by Congress, and the DCSA has not said which technologies it will use.

WHO IT HITSFederal background-check and security-clearance teams at the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency, plus the 2.8 million DoD staff who could be screened, would be affected if the program moves forward.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

The Pentagon's request comes amid heightened internal tension. Under Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, the department has increasingly used polygraph tests to find sources of alleged leaks to the press, and in September the New York Times reported that around 50 officers on the Joint Staff were given polygraph tests. The new program would be run by the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA), which handles background checks for the federal government. It is meant for vetting prospective employees and "insider threat detection," though the DCSA has not specified which technologies it would use.

The DoD has explored related technology before. In 2023, its Defense Innovation Unit selected Presage Technologies and Altec Research to build prototypes, including non-contact sensing that tracks head movement, facial skin temperature, and pore activity. But past efforts—from thermal cameras to brain scans—have not yielded reliable results outside the lab. Experts say the fundamental problem is that there is no single telltale sign of lying, and that AI would add uncertainty on top of an already invalid method. The 2003 National Research Council report found polygraph evidence "weak at best," and a screening test with the American Polygraph Association's claimed 80–94% accuracy could still falsely accuse many of the DoD's 2.8 million staff.

FAQ
What is the program called?
The program is called "Polygraph+" or "Polygraph Next".
Has the funding been approved?
No, the budget document has not yet been approved by Congress.
What technology would it use?
It would focus on AI and machine learning scoring algorithms and "standoff sensing," which takes physiological readings without attaching a device to the person.
MIT Technology Review AIRead Original Article

Get the latest AI Safety & Alignment news every morning

For example, today's edition would include:

  • White House tells OpenAI, Anthropic: hold models from UK testersTHE DECODER · 1h ago
  • NYC's Julie Menin unveils AI kill-switch bills, $25,000 finesFortune AI · 1h ago
  • Transluce ties 3 more attacks to OpenAI agent swarmSiliconANGLE AI · 7h ago

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick: one digest a day via Email, LINE, or Slack.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleGMI Cloud bets US$500 million on Taiwan AI factory