
What happened
LinkedIn is rolling out a button that lets users flag posts as "Seems like AI slop," part of a broader effort to reduce AI-generated content on the platform. The company is also building classifiers to identify AI-generated or low-quality posts and removing a feature that used AI to "enhance" posts, replacing it with a proofreading tool that preserves the user's voice.
Why it matters
An AI detector found that 41 percent of longform LinkedIn posts were flagged as completely AI-generated, suggesting the problem is widespread enough that LinkedIn's chief product officer calls it "a top priority." The report button and improved filters aim to make feeds more authentic and reduce the visibility of AI-generated content users encounter.
What to watch
LinkedIn says the report button will help "tune our models and make better feeds," and the company is also testing a way to show users when others feel their posts are inauthentic or heavily AI-written. The feature is currently live in the three-dots menu on posts.
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
LinkedIn has long struggled with the volume of AI-generated content cluttering its feed—a problem that became acute enough for the platform to declare it a "top priority." The Pangram detection study showing 41 percent of longform posts as AI-generated underscores the scale: nearly half of long-form content on the platform may lack authentic human authorship. This flood of "AI slop" (low-effort, often repetitive AI-generated posts) undermines the platform's core value proposition as a space for professional thought leadership and genuine networking.
LinkedIn's response combines user reporting tools, algorithmic filtering, and a reversal of one of its own AI features. The report button lets the community crowdsource detection, while new classifiers aim to identify and deprioritize AI-generated and low-quality content in suggested feeds and from users outside your network. Notably, LinkedIn is also pulling back on AI-powered post enhancement—a feature that promised to polish user-written content but may have encouraged users to rely on AI too heavily or obscured the line between human and machine writing. Replacing it with a voice-preserving proofreader signals that LinkedIn wants to preserve authenticity rather than polish generic posts into something they are not.
Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
The Motley Fool argues Amazon is the AI company of the two, since AWS was just 21% of first-half 2026 revenue…

Hewlett Packard Enterprise stock is down 5% at $55.87

Cammarata reinterprets InceptionV1's cat-car neuron as a V-shape detector, not two unrelated concepts

Google Deepmind's Gemini 4 Argon scored 97.5 percent on ARC-AGI-3 at a cost of $4,800, second only to GPT-6 As…

Microsoft's Surface Laptop Ultra, using Nvidia's RTX Spark platform, starts at $2,599 (up to $5,899)

Meta's new commercial terms, effective October 30th, appear to let it crawl and train AI on content from websi…
