LinkedIn has introduced a "Seems like AI slop" report button that lets users flag AI-generated posts, as part of a wider effort to reduce low-quality AI content on the platform.
According to an AI detector, 41 percent of longform LinkedIn posts are being flagged as completely AI-generated, making it a significant problem LinkedIn's product leadership says is a "top priority." The company is also deploying new classifiers to identify and filter AI-generated content from feeds and removing its AI post-enhancement feature in favor of a proofreading tool.
What happened
LinkedIn is rolling out a button that lets users flag posts as "Seems like AI slop," part of a broader effort to reduce AI-generated content on the platform. The company is also building classifiers to identify AI-generated or low-quality posts and removing a feature that used AI to "enhance" posts, replacing it with a proofreading tool that preserves the user's voice.
Why it matters
An AI detector found that 41 percent of longform LinkedIn posts were flagged as completely AI-generated, suggesting the problem is widespread enough that LinkedIn's chief product officer calls it "a top priority." The report button and improved filters aim to make feeds more authentic and reduce the visibility of AI-generated content users encounter.
What to watch
LinkedIn says the report button will help "tune our models and make better feeds," and the company is also testing a way to show users when others feel their posts are inauthentic or heavily AI-written. The feature is currently live in the three-dots menu on posts.
LinkedIn is tackling what it calls a critical problem: the proliferation of AI-generated content, or "AI slop," on the professional network. The platform has introduced a new reporting feature accessible via the three-dots menu on posts, labeled "Seems like AI slop." When a user clicks it, LinkedIn hides the post and displays a thank-you message for the feedback, giving the platform direct user signals about which content looks inauthentic or low-effort.
The decision comes against a backdrop of measurable AI-generation on the platform. AI detector Pangram found that 41 percent of longform LinkedIn posts were flagged as being completely generated by AI, according to reporting by 404Media. LinkedIn's chief product officer Hari Srinivasan acknowledged the urgency in a post, saying "AI slop is a top priority for all of us. We really care about this." The report button is one pillar of a broader offensive. LinkedIn is also deploying new classifiers designed to detect posts that are AI-generated or generally low-quality, with the goal of reducing how much AI slop appears in users' suggested content feeds and in content from people outside their network.
Beyond user reporting and filtering, LinkedIn is also pulling back on its own AI features. The platform is removing an AI "enhancement" feature that previously rewrote or polished user posts, replacing it with a proofreading tool that corrects grammar and spelling without altering the writer's voice or style. According to Srinivasan, this shift is intentional: the new tool "does not change your voice." Additionally, LinkedIn is testing a way to show users when others perceive their posts as inauthentic or heavy on AI usage, further surfacing the problem within the community itself. Collectively, these changes signal that LinkedIn views AI-generated content as a drain on feed quality and user trust, and intends to shift the platform back toward human-authored, authentic professional discourse.
LinkedIn has long struggled with the volume of AI-generated content cluttering its feed—a problem that became acute enough for the platform to declare it a "top priority." The Pangram detection study showing 41 percent of longform posts as AI-generated underscores the scale: nearly half of long-form content on the platform may lack authentic human authorship. This flood of "AI slop" (low-effort, often repetitive AI-generated posts) undermines the platform's core value proposition as a space for professional thought leadership and genuine networking.
LinkedIn's response combines user reporting tools, algorithmic filtering, and a reversal of one of its own AI features. The report button lets the community crowdsource detection, while new classifiers aim to identify and deprioritize AI-generated and low-quality content in suggested feeds and from users outside your network. Notably, LinkedIn is also pulling back on AI-powered post enhancement—a feature that promised to polish user-written content but may have encouraged users to rely on AI too heavily or obscured the line between human and machine writing. Replacing it with a voice-preserving proofreader signals that LinkedIn wants to preserve authenticity rather than polish generic posts into something they are not.
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytime
Google, Microsoft, and Meta continue expanding capital spending on AI infrastructure, signaling confidence tha…
ByteDance is reorganizing Doubao (its AI chatbot), Lark (workplace software), and Volcengine (cloud infrastruc…
Pegatron chairman Tzu-hsien Tung stated he remains optimistic about the long-term outlook for artificial intel…
Powertech Technology chairman DK Tsai said the company's FOPLP (Fan-Out Panel-Level Packaging) project with AM…
Nebius Group (NBIS) has more than doubled this year on strong demand for AI data centers with secured power, a…
Reddit reported Q2 earnings that surpassed estimates, driven by expansion in AI-powered advertising tools that…
The AI news that matters, in one minute each morning.
Sign up free