
IBM's stock fell 25% on July 14 after the company warned of weak second-quarter revenue and earnings, marking its worst trading day since 1968. CEO Arvind Krishna attributed the shortfall to customers redirecting spending toward AI hardware and chip purchases, and to delayed major deals—but reiterated that IBM's core software business faces no AI-driven disruption. This is the second AI-related stock panic for IBM in 2024; in February, similar fears proved overblown and the stock recovered, but the steeper drop this time raises questions about whether a structural challenge is now materializing.
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
Sign up free →What happened
IBM's stock dropped 25% on July 14, its worst day since 1968, after the company warned of weak second-quarter results—$2.93 per share and $17.2 billion(約2.8兆円) in revenue versus Wall Street expectations of $3.01 per share and $17.86 billion(約2.9兆円). CEO Arvind Krishna cited a shift in customer spending toward AI hardware and delayed major deals, but stated firmly that IBM's software business is not being disrupted by AI.
Why it matters
This is IBM's second major stock shock tied to AI fears in 2024. In February, when Anthropic released a Cobol-rewriting tool, investors panicked that IBM's legacy software business would suffer—but Krishna's reassurance proved correct and the stock recovered to new highs by June. Now the stock has fallen even further on different trigger (spending shifts and deal delays), raising the question of whether Krishna's confidence is justified this time or whether a real structural problem is finally surfacing.
What to watch
IBM's total market value fell to just under $200 billion(約32兆円) by week's end. Options traders are pricing in extreme uncertainty—the cost of betting on big IBM stock swings reached one of its highest levels ever, even higher than during the 2022 interest rate shock, suggesting the market expects sharp moves in either direction rather than accepting defeat.
On July 14, IBM's stock price fell 25%, marking the worst trading day in the company's history since records began in 1968—a drop steeper even than the October 19, 1987 crash. By week's end, IBM's market capitalization had fallen to just under $200 billion(約32兆円). The collapse was triggered by a profit warning: IBM reported second-quarter earnings of $2.93 per share on $17.2 billion(約2.8兆円) in revenue, both falling short of Wall Street's consensus expectations of $3.01 per share and $17.86 billion(約2.9兆円), according to FactSet.
CEO Arvind Krishna explained the miss in a letter to investors, disclosing that in late June customers abruptly shifted purchasing priorities toward AI servers, storage, and memory chips—buying hardware before prices rose—rather than IBM's traditional offerings. Krishna acknowledged that while IBM had anticipated some such reallocation, the magnitude surprised the company. Large deals also slipped past expected close dates. In a CNBC interview, Krishna added that Anthropic's Mythos AI model had prompted some companies to pause their cybersecurity spending while they evaluated actual needs, and that pause was affecting some IBM transactions. Despite the headwinds, Krishna was emphatic: "We don't see our software being disrupted by AI at all."
This is IBM's second major AI-related stock shock in 2024. In February, when Anthropic published a tool capable of rewriting legacy Cobol code, investors feared the move would threaten IBM's aging software business. The stock suffered its worst day in 25 years at that time. Krishna dismissed the fears as market overreaction—and proved correct. By June, the stock had rebounded to new highs. Now, facing a steeper decline on what appears to be a broader customer spending shift, Krishna is repeating his reassurance, leaving investors to judge whether the current move is another false panic or whether a real structural challenge is finally breaking through. Options traders are pricing in genuine uncertainty: the cost of wagering on large IBM stock swings has reached one of its highest levels ever, surpassing even the 2022 interest rate shock, a signal that traders expect volatile moves in either direction rather than consensus on the company's fate.
IBM's July plunge echoes February's AI panic but with a sharper edge. In February, when Anthropic released a Cobol-rewriting tool, investors feared IBM's legacy software franchise would be obsoleted; Krishna dismissed the concerns as overreaction, and he was vindicated—the stock bounced back to new highs by June. This time, however, the stock has fallen even further on a different mechanism: not a single technological threat, but a broad customer spending reallocation toward AI infrastructure, plus real deal delays (some reportedly tied to companies pausing cybersecurity spending while they reassess needs in light of Anthropic's Mythos model). Krishna is again insisting the core business is sound, but the magnitude and nature of the second shock—real revenue and earnings misses, not just market sentiment—suggest investors may be wrestling with something more structural than February's one-product scare. The fact that software sales grew 11% to $7.05 billion(約1.1兆円) in the prior quarter and beat expectations on both metrics offers some support for Krishna's bullish framing, yet it also underscores that the slowdown emerged suddenly.
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytime
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Log in to join the discussion





Get curated AI news from 200+ sources delivered daily to your inbox. Free to use.
Get Started FreeFree · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytime