AIToday
AI Safety & AlignmentAI Regulation & PolicyWIRED AIPublished: Sep 14, 2026, 22:00 JST

AI Leaders Urge Slowdown; Trump Team Says Do It Yourselves

AI Leaders Urge Slowdown; Trump Team Says Do It Yourselves

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei called on the US government to regulate AI companies to slow development, winning rare endorsements from OpenAI's Sam Altman and Elon Musk.

  2. Why it matters

    David Sacks and House Speaker Mike Johnson pushed back, saying labs need no permission to slow down.

  3. What to watch

    Altman committed to Amodei's proposal for third-party evaluators with employee-level access, a voluntary step that hinges on labs following through.

WHO IT HITSAI lab executives and policymakers are directly affected, as voluntary safety measures and regulatory proposals are debated while the US aims to maintain its AI lead over China.

Ask the AI about this article →

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

The debate over AI safety has moved from hypothetical risks to concrete proposals. Dario Amodei's essay, published Saturday, asked Washington to regulate AI companies and allow them to coordinate on standards without running afoul of antitrust law. That request drew support from OpenAI's Sam Altman and Elon Musk, a rare alignment between rival lab leaders. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella also called for pacing development.

But the political response was swift and dismissive. David Sacks, co-chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, rejected the idea that labs need government permission to slow down, and questioned whether altruism was the real motive. House Speaker Mike Johnson warned that emergency regulation would cede the AI race to China, a concern President Trump echoed by saying he wants to keep the US lead. The administration's priority is clear: not to slow down.

In response, labs are attempting voluntary measures to rebuild public trust. Altman's commitment to third-party evaluators with employee-level access, despite "significant costs," suggests an effort to show responsibility without formal regulation. Whether these steps will be enough to address safety concerns—or whether they will be seen as inadequate—remains to be seen.

FAQ
What did Dario Amodei propose?
He asked the US government to regulate AI companies and enable them to work together on standards without breaching antitrust law.
How did the Trump administration respond?
David Sacks said labs don't need permission to slow down, and Trump said he wants to keep the US lead over China in AI.
What voluntary step did Sam Altman commit to?
He agreed to give embedded third-party evaluators employee-level access to check safety practices and report incidents.

Get the latest AI Safety & Alignment news every morning

For example, today's edition would include:

  • Beijing warns of six AI risks, rejects US slowdown callsSemafor Tech · 1h ago
  • US House takes up data center bill as AI rules push growsSemafor Tech · 1h ago
  • Jacob Coxon's AI doom warning goes mainstream after Anthropic exitFortune AI · 1h ago

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Related Articles

Next articleMicrosoft's 37-page "humanist AI code of conduct" puts people over AI